Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38125598›Full record

ArticleNanoscale advances2023

Confinement primes cells for faster migration by polarizing active mitochondria.

Jenna A Mosier, Emily D Fabiano, Catherine M Ludolph, Addison E White, Cynthia A Reinhart-King

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Extracellular vesicle-like particles fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Measurement of cellular traction forces during confined migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Mitochondria power the nucleus under pressure.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Mechanical signatures in cancer metastasis.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jenna A MosierDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville TN USA cynthia.reinhart-king@vanderbilt.edu.
Emily D FabianoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville TN USA cynthia.reinhart-king@vanderbilt.edu.
Catherine M LudolphDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA.
Addison E WhiteDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville TN USA cynthia.reinhart-king@vanderbilt.edu.
Cynthia A Reinhart-KingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville TN USA cynthia.reinhart-king@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6959-3914
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Molecular Determinants of Confined MigrationR01GM131178 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MARKOV, DMITRY · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical cues in the tumor microenvironment interplay with internal cellular processes to control cancer cell migration. Microscale pores present in tumor tissue confer varying degrees of confinement on migrating cells, increasing matrix contact and inducing cytoskeletal rearrangement. Previously, we observed that increased collagen matrix contact significantly increased cell migration speed and cell-induced strains within the matrix. However, the effects of this confinement on future cell migration are not fully understood. Here, we use a collagen microtrack platform to determine the effect of confinement on priming MDA-MB-231 cancer cells for fast migration. We show that migration through a confined track results in increased speed and accumulation of migratory machinery, including actin and active mitochondria, in the front of migrating breast cancer cells. By designing microtracks that allow cells to first navigate a region of high confinement, then a region of low confinement, we assessed whether migration in high confinement changes future migratory behavior. Indeed, cells maintain their speed attained in high confinement even after exiting to a region of low confinement, indicating that cells maintain memory of previous matrix cues to fuel fast migration. Active mitochondria maintain their location at the front of the cell even after cells leave high confinement. Furthermore, knocking out vinculin to disrupt focal adhesions disrupts active mitochondrial localization and disrupts the fast migration seen upon release from confinement. Together, these data suggest that active mitochondrial localization in confinement may facilitate fast migration post-confinement. By better understanding how confinement contributes to future cancer cell migration, we can identify potential therapeutic targets to inhibit breast cancer metastasis.

Identifiers

PMID38125598
PMCPMC10729874
OpenAlexW4388917175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.