ArticleHeliyon2023
CHD2 pathogenic nonsense variant in a three-generation family with variable phenotype and a paracentric inversion 16: Case report.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adult Phenotype ofNeurology. Genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromosomal inversions are usually balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements that do not have an impact on the clinical phenotype of a carrier. The main clinical consequence of inversions is the risk for unbalanced gametes and offspring with severe phenotypes. Rarely though, inversions are associated with a phenotype, mainly due to submicroscopic Copy Number Variants (CNVs) or disruption at the breakpoints of a functionally important gene and/or genomic elements. In this study, a paracentric inversion of chromosome 16 [inv(16)(q22.3q24.1)] was identified in a three-generation family with discordant phenotypes with/without epilepsy and/or intellectual impairment, as well as with an unaffected carrier. This finding was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Genetic investigation, initially with chromosomal microarray (CMA), did not reveal any copy number variants. Finally, Clinical Exome Sequencing (CES), detected the presence of a pathogenic nonsense variant (rs797044912) in the Chromodomain Helicase DNA-binding protein 2 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.