Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38125485›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Comparison of color spectrophotometer and Vis/NIR spectroscopy on assessing natural pigments of cucumber applied with different ethephon concentrations.

Kusumiyati Kusumiyati, Ine Elisa Putri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kusumiyati KusumiyatiMaster Program of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.
Ine Elisa PutriMaster Program of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.
Padjadjaran University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, the development of non-destructive measurement methods for agricultural commodities has gained a lot of attention among scientists, but these techniques have different levels of accuracy for each instrument used. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the prediction accuracy of natural pigments, such as Total Carotenoid Content (TCC) and Total Flavonoid Content (TFC) using a color spectrophotometer and Visible/Near-Infrared (Vis/NIR) spectroscopy (381-1065 nm). The effect of ethephon concentration on the spectral characteristics and the accuracy of predicting pigments was studied. The samples used include cucumber fruit, which consisted of the 'Mars', 'Vanesa', and 'Roberto' varieties. During the planting of the fruit, ethephon was applied at different concentrations of 0 ppm, 150 ppm, and 300 ppm. The results showed that the best accuracy for predicting TCC was obtained through a color spectrophotometer (R

Indexed as

Food scanningFruit qualityNon-destructivePrediction

Identifiers

PMID38125485
PMCPMC10730989
OpenAlexW4388840308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.