ArticleHeliyon2023
3How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The Design Science Approach.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- E-Learning Modules Based on Bloom Taxonomy and the Miller Pyramid for First-Year Indian Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Study in Medical Education.JMIR human factors · 2026Trial
- Near-Peer Teaching to Integrate Anatomical Imaging into the Medical School Curriculum.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Expert patients improve health literacy, self-care attitudes, and practices in people with diabetes: a quasi-experimental study in Tanzania.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the use of a digital visual collaboration platform in pediatric clinical teaching: medical students' experiences and perceptions-cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Reimagining teaching in higher education: Impact of a pilot physically active learning intervention on perceived teaching effectiveness.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Gamifying anatomy outreach: An underexplored opportunity.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Review
- The impact of artificial intelligence-assisted teaching on medical students' learning outcomes: an integrated model based on the ARCS model and constructivist theory.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Higher education strongly focuses on shifting from a more traditional teaching approach - "instructivist" to a more student-centered approach - known as "constructivist" to encourage learning imperative key skills in a future turbulent environment. This study examines the application of new learning environment creation, integrated from applying the Design Science approach and Constructivism learning environment, on two critical elements of student evaluation, namely, students' learning motivation and their learning strategy in higher institutions. Quantitative research was adopted for the study. To do so, a new teaching and learning approach was developed and implemented specifically for one cohort. Instead of regularly joining a regular classroom, students can actively attend workshops to gain the skills, knowledge, and action they need to complete the course successfully. Following three months of implementation, 193 questionnaires were collected from all students who took a Project Management course. The data show that a constructivist learning environment encourages intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Additionally, the student's learning strategy significantly improved in the new learning environment. These findings demonstrate that further attention should be given to constructivist orientation and implementation in the higher education curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.