Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38125434›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Government and dealer regulatory decisions on producer illegal production in China's food supply chain.

Dong Cai, Kee-Hung Lai, Chun-Xiang Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dong CaiSchool of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Kee-Hung LaiPolyU Business School, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hum, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Chun-Xiang GuoBusiness School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illegal food production in China has proliferated in recent years, triggering serious public concerns on food safety. In this work, we model a regulatory event in a food supply chain comprising a local government, a dealer, and a producer involved in illegal food production, and get equilibrium regulatory decisions of the government and the dealer, and equilibrium production decisions of the producer. The results show that: 1) in a situation where the producer is likely to produce illegally, the government does not regulate, and implements insufficient or sufficient regulation according to the utility-cost ratio of regulating. 2) The regulatory decisions of the dealer depend not only on the regulatory decisions of the government but also on the utility-cost ratio of regulating. 3) Only when the joint regulatory intensity of the government and the dealer is not less than a certain threshold value, the producer will not produce illegally, and the threshold value is the optimal regulatory intensity jointly implemented by the government and the dealer. Otherwise it is ineffective, inadequate, or excessive regulation. Therefore, we suggest that the government and the dealer jointly make regulatory decisions to achieve optimal regulation at the lowest regulatory cost and evade illegal food production by the producer.

Indexed as

Food safetyIllegal productionOptimal regulationRegulatory intensityUtility-cost ratio

Identifiers

PMID38125434
PMCPMC10730582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.