ArticleCureus2023
Application of InceptionV3, SqueezeNet, and VGG16 Convoluted Neural Networks in the Image Classification of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Enabled Automated Quality Control for Liver MR Elastography: Initial Results.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Early childhood caries (ECC) prediction models using Machine Learning.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Automated classification of elongated styloid processes using deep learning models-an artificial intelligence diagnostics.Frontiers in oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly emerging field in medicine and has applications in diagnostics, therapeutics, and prognostication in various malignancies. The present study was conducted to analyze and compare the accuracy of three deep learning neural networks for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) images. Materials and methods Three hundred and twenty-five cases of OSCC were included and graded histologically by two grading systems. The images were then analyzed using the Orange data mining tool. Three neural networks, viz., InceptionV3, SqueezeNet, and VGG16, were used for further analysis and classification. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, specificity, sensitivity, area under curve (AUC), and accuracy were estimated for each neural network. Results Histological grading by Bryne's yielded significantly stronger inter-observer agreement. The highest accuracy was found for the classification of poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma images irrespective of the network used. Other values were variegated. Conclusion AI could serve as an adjunct for improvement in theragnostics. Further research is required to achieve the modification of mining tools for greater predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, AUC, accuracy, and security. Bryne's grading system is warranted for the better application of AI in OSCC image analytics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.