Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38125218›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

The Use and Efficacy of Oral Phenylephrine Versus Placebo Treating Nasal Congestion Over the Years on Adults: A Systematic Review.

Jaqueline Livier Castillo, Jose R Flores Valdés, Maria Maney Orellana, Sruthi Satish, Chimaobi E Ijioma, Janet Benjamin, Elisa Ramirez Alvarez, Marily Martinez Ramirez, Victor Sebastian Arruarana, Ernesto Calderon Martinez

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A comment on oral phenylephrine use in sinonasal pathologies.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Jaqueline Livier CastilloInternal Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, MEX.
Jose R Flores ValdésInternal Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, MEX.
Maria Maney OrellanaInternal Medicine, Universidad de Carabobo, Valencia, VEN.
Sruthi SatishInternal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal, IND.
Chimaobi E IjiomaMedicine and Surgery, Abia State University Faculty of Medicine, Uturu, Umuahia, NGA.
Janet BenjaminInternal Medicine, Ross University School of Medicine, Miramar, USA.
Elisa Ramirez AlvarezInternal Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, MEX.
Marily Martinez RamirezInternal Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, MEX.
Victor Sebastian ArruaranaInternal Medicine, Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, New York, USA.
Ernesto Calderon MartinezBiomedical Informatics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, MEX.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXKasturba Medical College, Manipal · INUniversidad Autónoma de Guadalajara · MXUniversity of Carabobo · VEBrookdale University Hospital and Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal congestion is a common issue stemming from various factors such as allergies and anatomical variations. Allergic rhinitis frequently leads to nasal congestion. The pathophysiology involves inflammation, swelling, and mucus production in the nasal mucosa. Multiple treatments are available, including oral phenylephrine, an over-the-counter or prescription option. However, the effectiveness and safety of phenylephrine have been subjects of debate. This systematic review aims to provide an updated perspective on the efficacy of oral phenylephrine versus placebo in addressing nasal congestion in adults. We conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a systematic review involving searches on PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were defined to identify high-quality studies. The focus was on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control studies published in English between 1998 and 2023, involving adult populations. The interventions compared oral phenylephrine with placebo or standard care, with outcomes centering on changes in nasal congestion symptoms and nasal airway resistance. We identified four articles that met the criteria. These studies exhibited varied designs and populations. The findings consistently indicated that phenylephrine was not more effective than a placebo in relieving nasal congestion. This systematic review demonstrates that oral phenylephrine did not offer substantial relief from nasal congestion compared to a placebo in adults. The studies featured diverse designs, yet the prevailing conclusion was that phenylephrine's efficacy was limited. Safety assessments showed no life-threatening adverse events, with common side effects including headaches and mild discomfort. In summary, this systematic review indicates that oral phenylephrine is not significantly more effective than a placebo in alleviating nasal congestion in adults. Clinicians should explore alternative treatment options, considering the review's limitations. Additional research may be needed to clarify the role of oral phenylephrine in managing nasal congestion.

Indexed as

allergicallergic rhinitisnasal airflownasal congestionnasal decongestantoralphenylephrinerhinitisseasonalsinusitis

Identifiers

PMID38125218
PMCPMC10730950
OpenAlexW4388832418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.