Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38124996›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024

Scaling up antivenom for snakebite envenoming in the Brazilian Amazon: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Armand Zimmerman, Wuelton Monteiro, Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, Emily R Smith, Thiago Rocha, Jacqueline Sachett, Fan Hui Wen, Catherine Staton, Charles J Gerardo, Osondu Ogbuoji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Snakebite Envenomations In The Brazilian Amazon: A Little Less Neglected.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Armand ZimmermanDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Wuelton MonteiroEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Joao Ricardo Nickenig VissociDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Emily R SmithDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Thiago RochaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Jacqueline SachettEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Fan Hui WenInstituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Catherine StatonDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Charles J GerardoDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Osondu OgbuojiDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Duke University · USUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRInstituto Butantan · BR

Funding

Using community health centers to mitigate the impact of snakebite envenoming in low resource areasR21TW011944 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GERARDO, CHARLES JOHN · 2021 to 2022
$534k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW011944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Snakebite envenoming (SBE) affects nearly three million people yearly, causing up to 180,000 deaths and 400,000 cases of permanent disability. Brazil's state of Amazonas is a global hotspot for SBE, with one of the highest annual incidence rates per 100,000 people, worldwide. Despite this burden, snake antivenom remains inaccessible to a large proportion of SBE victims in Amazonas. This study estimates the costs, and health and economic benefits of scaling up antivenom to community health centers (CHCs) and hospitals in the state. Methods: We built a decision tree model to simulate three different antivenom scale-up scenarios: (1) scale up to 95% of hospitals, (2) scale up to 95% of CHCs, and (3) scale up to 95% of hospitals and 95% of CHCs. We consider each scenario with and without a 10% increase in demand for antivenom among SBE victims. For each scenario, we model the treatment costs averted, deaths averted, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted from a societal, health system, and patient perspective relative to the status quo and over a time horizon of one year. For each scenario and perspective, we also calculate the incremental cost per DALY averted and per death averted. We use a willingness to pay threshold equal to the 2022 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of Brazil. Findings: Scaling up antivenom to 95% of hospitals averts up to 2022 DALYs, costs up to USD $460 per DALY averted from a health system perspective, but results in net economic benefits up to USD $4.42 million from a societal perspective. Scaling up antivenom to 95% of CHCs averts up to 3179 DALYs, costs up to USD $308 per DALY averted from a health system perspective, but results in net economic benefits up to USD $7.35 million from a societal perspective. Scaling up antivenom to 95% of hospitals and CHCs averts up to 3922 DALYs, costs up to USD $328 per DALY averted from a health system perspective, but results in net economic benefits up to USD $8.98 million from a societal perspective. Interpretation: All three antivenom scale up scenarios - scale up to 95% of hospitals, scale up to 95% of CHCs, and scale up to 95% of hospitals and 95% of CHCs - avert a substantial proportion of the SBE burden in Amazonas and are cost-saving from a societal perspective and cost-effective from a health system perspective. Funding: W.M. and J.S. were funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq productivity scholarships). W.M. was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (PRÓ-ESTADO, call n. 011/2021-PCGP/FAPEAM, call n. 010/2021-CT&I ÁREAS PRIORITÁRIAS, call n. 003/2022-PRODOC/FAPEAM, POSGRAD/FAPEAM) and by the Ministry of Health, Brazil (Proposal No. 733781/19-035). Research reported in this publication was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21TW011944. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

AmazonAntivenomBrazilCost-effectivenessEconomic evaluationEnvenomingLMICSnakebite

Identifiers

PMID38124996
PMCPMC10733094
OpenAlexW4389725913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.