Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38124497›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2023

Fidelity, adaptation and integration of whole-school health promotion within Dutch schools: a cross-sectional survey study.

Gerjanne Vennegoor, Patricia van Assema, Gerard R M Molleman, Pepijn van Empelen, Joyce Dieleman, Maria W J Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gerjanne VennegoorAcademic Collaborative Center for Public Health Limburg, P.O. Box 33, 6400 AA Heerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-7445
Patricia van AssemaAcademic Collaborative Center for Public Health Limburg, P.O. Box 33, 6400 AA Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Gerard R M MollemanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Academic Collaborative Center AMPHI, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1991-6273
Pepijn van EmpelenExpertise Center Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), P.O. Box 3005, 2301 DA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joyce DielemanPublic Health Service Noord- en Oost Gelderland, Academic Collaborative Center AGORA, P.O. Box 3, 7200 AA Zutphen, The Netherlands.
Maria W J JansenAcademic Collaborative Center for Public Health Limburg, P.O. Box 33, 6400 AA Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development 531001113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementing comprehensive health promotion programs in the school setting can be challenging, as schools can be considered complex adaptive systems. As a first step towards understanding what works in improving implementation for which schools and under which conditions, this study aimed to examine the degree of implementation of health promoting school (HPS) programs, in terms of five dimensions of fidelity (adherence, dose, participant responsiveness, quality of delivery and program differentiation), and the dimensions of adaptation and integration. The HPS Implementation Questionnaire was distributed among ± 2400 primary, secondary, secondary vocational and special needs schools in the Netherlands. Employees of 535 schools (22.3%) filled out the questionnaire. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and ANOVA tests. The average degree of implementation was 2.55 (SD = 0.58, range = 0.68-3.90; scaled 0-4). The lowest scores were achieved for participant responsiveness and adherence, and the highest for integration and adaptation. Schools that identified as HPS reported significantly higher overall degree of implementation, adherence, dose, participant responsiveness, program differentiation and adaptation than schools that didn't. Primary schools achieved a significantly higher degree of implementation, dose, participant responsiveness, quality of delivery and integration than other school types. In conclusion, many schools work on student health and well-being to some extent, but the vast majority have much room for improvement. Higher implementation scores for schools that identified as HPS underline the value of HPS programs. A broader perspective on health and more insight into conditions for effectiveness and implementation in secondary and secondary vocational schools are needed.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesSchoolsCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PromotionHumansSurveys and Questionnaireshealth promoting schoolHPS implementation questionnaireimplementationsurvey studythe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID38124497
PMCPMC10733658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.