Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38124469›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2024

Food pattern modeling to inform global guidance on complementary feeding of infants.

Mary Arimond, Doris Wiesmann, Laurence M Grummer-Strawn, Elaine L Ferguson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary ArimondTakoma Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1357-9077
Doris WiesmannHalendorf, Schönwalde, Germany.
Laurence M Grummer-StrawnDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elaine L FergusonDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-5128

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient needs are difficult to meet during infancy due to high nutrient requirements and the small quantities of food consumed. Guidelines to support food choice decisions are critical to promoting optimal infant health, growth and development and food pattern modeling can be used to inform guideline development. We employed the Optifood modeling system to determine if unfortified complementary foods could meet 13 nutrient targets for breastfed infants (6-11 months), and to describe food patterns that met, or came as close as possible to meeting targets. We also examined the impacts of eliminating food groups, increasing starchy staple foods or adding sentinel unhealthy foods. We collated a global food list from dietary studies in 37 countries and used this list to develop nutrient values for a set of 35 food subgroups. We analyzed infant dietary intakes from studies in eight countries to inform maximum quantities and frequencies of consumption for these subgroups in weekly food patterns. We found that unfortified foods could meet targets for most infants for 12 nutrients, but not for iron. For the smallest and youngest infants, with the lowest energy intakes, there were additional deficits for minerals. Best-case food patterns that met targets or came as close as possible to meeting targets included ample amounts of diverse vegetables, diverse plant- and animal-source protein foods, small amounts of whole grain foods and dairy and no refined grains or added fats or sugar. There were nutrient deficits if animal-source foods or vegetables were eliminated or if unhealthy foods were included.

Indexed as

Infant FoodAnimalsBreast FeedingDietEnergy IntakeFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaVegetablescomplementary feedinginfantmicronutrientsprotein foodsunhealthy foodsvegetables

Identifiers

PMID38124469
PMCPMC10981476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.