ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2024
Rice Yellow Mottle Virus resistance by genome editing of the Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica nucleoporin gene OsCPR5.1 but not OsCPR5.2.
Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in CRISPR Plant Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The role of phase separation for RNA and protein transport through the nuclear pore complex.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Review
- Methylviologen resistance in loss-of-function mutants of the polyamine transporter gene OsLAT5.PloS one · 2026Article
- Biotechnological breakthroughs in rice disease management: an overview from transgenics to CRISPR.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Can the molecular and transgenic breeding of crops be an alternative and sustainable technology to meet food demand?Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Accelerating crop improvement via integration of transcriptome-based network biology and genome editing.Planta · 2025Review
- Unleashing the Potential of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing for Yield-Related Traits in Rice.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recent advances of CRISPR-based genome editing for enhancing staple crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- The potential of genome editing to create novel alleles of resistance genes in rice.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- CRISPR-Cas System, a Possible "Savior" of Rice Threatened by Climate Change: An Updated Review.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Powering Genome Editing in Rice by Harnessing Promising Gene Resources: A Comprehensive Roadmap.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) causes one of the most devastating rice diseases in Africa. Management of RYMV is challenging. Genetic resistance provides the most effective and environment-friendly control. The recessive resistance locus rymv2 (OsCPR5.1) had been identified in African rice (Oryza glaberrima), however, introgression into Oryza sativa ssp. japonica and indica remains challenging due to crossing barriers. Here, we evaluated whether CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of the two rice nucleoporin paralogs OsCPR5.1 (RYMV2) and OsCPR5.2 can be used to introduce RYMV resistance into the japonica variety Kitaake. Both paralogs had been shown to complement the defects of the Arabidopsis atcpr5 mutant, indicating partial redundancy. Despite striking sequence and structural similarities between the two paralogs, only oscpr5.1 loss-of-function mutants were fully resistant, while loss-of-function oscpr5.2 mutants remained susceptible, intimating that OsCPR5.1 plays a specific role in RYMV susceptibility. Notably, edited lines with short in-frame deletions or replacements in the N-terminal domain (predicted to be unstructured) of OsCPR5.1 were hypersusceptible to RYMV. In contrast to mutations in the single Arabidopsis AtCPR5 gene, which caused severely dwarfed plants, oscpr5.1 and oscpr5.2 single and double knockout mutants showed neither substantial growth defects nor symptoms indicative lesion mimic phenotypes, possibly reflecting functional differentiation. The specific editing of OsCPR5.1, while maintaining OsCPR5.2 activity, provides a promising strategy for generating RYMV-resistance in elite Oryza sativa lines as well as for effective stacking with other RYMV resistance genes or other traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.