ArticleBMJ quality & safety2024
How to co-design a prototype of a clinical practice tool: a framework with practical guidance and a case study.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Management of choking in Motor Neuron Disease: patient and public involvement in a co-produced mixed-methods study protocol.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Co-Designing a Clinician-Centered Video Gait Assessment System for Cerebral Palsy Based on the Framework for Co-Design of Clinical Practice Tools: Iterative Development and Formative Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Foundation models in biomedical imaging: turning hype into reality.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Physical Activity Guidance Resources for Rural Families of Neurodiverse or Developmentally Diverse Children: Exploratory Co-Design Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Co-design-related approaches in medication safety for people with dementia: A scoping review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Forecasting the Impacts of Artificial Intelligence Assistance in Virtual Consultations for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Futures Wheel Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Co-designing emergency communication for patients with mechanical circulatory support devices.JHLT open · 2026Article
- The Early Movers Clinician's Guide: Co-Designing a Resource for the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines in Paediatric Occupational Therapy.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
- Examining usability of RxFill: integrating health IT to support medication adherence.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing Multimorbidity Care: A Narrative Review on Artificial Intelligence Applications.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Does ambient voice technology in healthcare really save time? The need for rigorous evaluation to test the promise.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Applying journey mapping and human-centered design to improve critical care delivery for patients with acute respiratory failure.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Reimagining simulation for quality and safety in healthcare: connecting paradigms, methods, and communities.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Designing Patient-Friendly Messages: Tutorial on Applying Human-Centered, Self-Determination Theory With AI Considerations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Improving usability of the STOPP/START version 3 criteria: development of a practice tool for clinicians, students and researchers.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Operationalizing a learning health system: A self-assessment tool for interprofessional teams.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Guiding Clostridioides difficile Infection Prevention Efforts in a Hospital Setting With AI.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Developing a Prototype Home-Based Toothbrushing Support Tool for Families in Scotland: A Mixed-Methods Study With Modified Delphi Survey and Semi-Structured Interviews.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Article
- Integrating patient and public involvement into co-design of healthcare improvement: a case study in maternity care.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical tools for use in practice-such as medicine reconciliation charts, diagnosis support tools and track-and-trigger charts-are endemic in healthcare, but relatively little attention is given to how to optimise their design. User-centred design approaches and co-design principles offer potential for improving usability and acceptability of clinical tools, but limited practical guidance is currently available. We propose a framework (FRamework for co-dESign of Clinical practice tOols or 'FRESCO') offering practical guidance based on user-centred methods and co-design principles, organised in five steps: (1) establish a multidisciplinary advisory group; (2) develop initial drafts of the prototype; (3) conduct think-aloud usability evaluations; (4) test in clinical simulations; (5) generate a final prototype informed by workshops. We applied the framework in a case study to support co-design of a prototype track-and-trigger chart for detecting and responding to possible fetal deterioration during labour. This started with establishing an advisory group of 22 members with varied expertise. Two initial draft prototypes were developed-one based on a version produced by national bodies, and the other with similar content but designed using human factors principles. Think-aloud usability evaluations of these prototypes were conducted with 15 professionals, and the findings used to inform co-design of an improved draft prototype. This was tested with 52 maternity professionals from five maternity units through clinical simulations. Analysis of these simulations and six workshops were used to co-design the final prototype to the point of readiness for large-scale testing. By codifying existing methods and principles into a single framework, FRESCO supported mobilisation of the expertise and ingenuity of diverse stakeholders to co-design a prototype track-and-trigger chart in an area of pressing service need. Subject to further evaluation, the framework has potential for application beyond the area of clinical practice in which it was applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.