Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38124113›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

This needs to be a journey that we're actually on together'-the introduction of integrated care systems for children and young people in England: a qualitative study of the views of local system stakeholders during winter 2021/22.

Steven Hope, Evgenia Stepanova, Oliver Lloyd-Houldey, Frances Hillier-Brown, Dougal Hargreaves, Dasha Nicholls, Carolyn Summerbell, Russell M Viner, Zainab Dedat, Emily C Owen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Steven HopePopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK. s.hope@ucl.ac.uk.
Evgenia StepanovaPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Oliver Lloyd-HouldeyPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Frances Hillier-BrownPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Dougal HargreavesMohn Centre for Children's Health & Wellbeing, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dasha NichollsDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Carolyn SummerbellDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Russell M VinerPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Zainab DedatEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Emily C OwenDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Stephanie ScottPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research PD-SPH-2015-10025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated care has become a central feature of health system reform worldwide. In England, Integrated Care Systems (ICS) are intended to improve integration across public health, the National Health Service (NHS), education and social care. By April 2021, England had been divided into 42 geographical areas, each tasked with developing local ICS provision. However, it was not clear how ICSs would address the specific needs of children and young people (CYP). This study elicited the views of senior professional stakeholders in the first year of the ICS national roll out, to learn how integrated care for CYP was being implemented within the ICSs and future plans for service provision.

methodsA qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, NHS managers and local authority leaders (n = 25) selected from a diverse sample of ICSs (n = 7) across England, conducted during winter 2021/22. Reflexive thematic analysis involving a collaborative coding approach was used to analyse interview transcripts.

resultsFour themes were identified, indicating challenges and opportunities for ICSs in relation to the health of CYP: 1) Best start in life (a more holistic approach to health afforded by integrated care); 2) Local and national contexts (tensions between local and national settings and priorities); 3) Funding and planning (instituting innovative, long-term plans using limited existing CYP funding streams); 4) Organisational complexities (integrating the work of diverse organisations).

conclusionsThe views of stakeholders, provided at the beginning of the journey towards developing local ICS CYP provision, revealed a common aspiration to change focus from provision of acute, largely adult-orientated services towards one with a broader, population health remit, including prevention and early intervention. This would be delivered by integration of a range of local services, including health, education, housing and social care, to set CYP on a life-long path towards improved health and wellbeing. Yet there was an awareness that change would take place over time within existing national policy and funding frameworks, and would require overcoming organisational barriers through further developing local collaborations and partnerships. As ICSs mature, the experiences of stakeholders should continue to be canvassed to identify practical lessons for successful CYP integrated care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedState MedicineAdolescentAdultChildEnglandHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchChild healthHealth policyHealth systemsIntegrated carePaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID38124113
PMCPMC10734058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.