Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38124106›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2023

Combining generative modelling and semi-supervised domain adaptation for whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography segmentation.

Marica Muffoletto, Hao Xu, Karl P Kunze, Radhouene Neji, René Botnar, Claudia Prieto, Daniel Rückert, Alistair A Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cardiac function assessment with deep-learning-based automatic segmentation of free-running four-dimensional whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marica MuffolettoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, St Thomas' Hospital, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge, London, SW1 7EH, UK. marica.muffoletto@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0756-0054
Hao XuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, St Thomas' Hospital, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge, London, SW1 7EH, UK.
Karl P KunzeSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, St Thomas' Hospital, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge, London, SW1 7EH, UK.
Radhouene NejiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, St Thomas' Hospital, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge, London, SW1 7EH, UK.
René BotnarSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, St Thomas' Hospital, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge, London, SW1 7EH, UK.
Claudia PrietoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, St Thomas' Hospital, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge, London, SW1 7EH, UK.
Daniel RückertBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alistair A YoungSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College, St Thomas' Hospital, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge, London, SW1 7EH, UK.

Funding

The Cardiac Atlas ProjectR01HL121754 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCCULLOCH, ANDREW D., OMENS, JEFFREY H. · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121754Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantification of three-dimensional (3D) cardiac anatomy is important for the evaluation of cardiovascular diseases. Changes in anatomy are indicative of remodeling processes as the heart tissue adapts to disease. Although robust segmentation methods exist for computed tomography angiography (CTA), few methods exist for whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiograms (CMRA) which are more challenging due to variable contrast, lower signal to noise ratio and a limited amount of labeled data.

methodsTwo state-of-the-art unsupervised generative deep learning domain adaptation architectures, generative adversarial networks and variational auto-encoders, were applied to 3D whole heart segmentation of both conventional (n = 20) and high-resolution (n = 45) CMRA (target) images, given segmented CTA (source) images for training. An additional supervised loss function was implemented to improve performance given 10%, 20% and 30% segmented CMRA cases. A fully supervised nn-UNet trained on the given CMRA segmentations was used as the benchmark.

resultsThe addition of a small number of segmented CMRA training cases substantially improved performance in both generative architectures in both standard and high-resolution datasets. Compared with the nn-UNet benchmark, the generative methods showed substantially better performance in the case of limited labelled cases. On the standard CMRA dataset, an average 12% (adversarial method) and 10% (variational method) improvement in Dice score was obtained.

conclusionsUnsupervised domain-adaptation methods for CMRA segmentation can be boosted by the addition of a small number of supervised target training cases. When only few labelled cases are available, semi-supervised generative modelling is superior to supervised methods.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCardiovascular SystemHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPredictive Value of TestsDeep learningDomain adaptationGenerative adversarial networksVariational auto-encodersWhole-heart segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38124106
PMCPMC10734115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.