Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38124079›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2023

Development and validation of the Nurse Team Resilience Scale (NTRS) in the context of public health emergencies.

Ya Su, Lin Wang, Tangyu Chen, Liwen Liao, SanLian Hu, Yan Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ya Su *School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 227 S Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Lin Wang *School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 227 S Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Tangyu Chen *School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 227 S Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Liwen LiaoSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 227 S Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China.
SanLian HuDepartment of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China. liuliu9027@163.com.
Yan YangRenji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.1630 Dongfang Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, China. renji_yy@126.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNRenji Hospital · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Innovative Research Team of High-Level Local Universities in Shanghai SHSMU-ZDCX20212800National Natural Science Foundation of China 72004137Shanghai Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project 2018BGL032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeam resilience can help nurse to respond positively to adversity at work and maintain normal team function in complex and unstable environments. However, much less research attention has been paid to team resilience than to individual resilience, and nurses lack reliable and valid tools to measure team resilience. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a scale that measures the nursing team resilience in the context of a public health emergency.

methodsThe study was conducted in three stages that item development, scale development, and scale evaluation. This scale was based on that of Morgan and Sharma et al. proposed four-factor team resilience model, and the draft scale was generated based on the literature review, existing scales, experts' validations, and cognitive interviews. During July 2022 to August 2022, the construct validity and the internal consistency reliability of the NTRS were evaluated through an online survey of 421 nurses.

resultsThe 8-item NTRS scale has good reliability and validity and is suitable for measuring the nurse team resilience. The EFA found a common factor solution and explained 72.33% of the common varianc and the CFA score showed construct validity. Reliability of the internal consistency of the scale with a good Cronbach alpha of 0.94.

conclusionThis scale can assess team resilience in nurses that nursing education and management resources can be allocated to improve policies and training programs to provide effective positive support to nurses in challenging workplace situations and to enable greater health systems resilience in the future.

Indexed as

Instrument validation studyNursesPublic health emergenciesScale developmentTeam resilience

Identifiers

PMID38124079
PMCPMC10731786
OpenAlexW4390011066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.