Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38124044›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Understanding cancer patient cohorts in virtual reality environment for better clinical decisions: a usability study.

Zhonglin Qu, Quang Vinh Nguyen, Chng Wei Lau, Andrew Johnston, Paul J Kennedy, Simeon Simoff, Daniel Catchpoole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhonglin QuSchool of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. 18885806@student.westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4500-004X
Quang Vinh NguyenMARCS Institute and School of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0815-6224
Chng Wei LauSchool of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9652-134X
Andrew JohnstonSchool of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8306-7507
Paul J KennedySchool of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7837-3171
Simeon SimoffMARCS Institute and School of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9895-4109
Daniel CatchpooleSchool of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia. daniel.catchpoole@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5836-1413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisualising patient genomic data in a cohort with embedding data analytics models can provide relevant and sensible patient comparisons to assist a clinician with treatment decisions. As immersive technology is actively used around the medical world, there is a rising demand for an efficient environment that can effectively display genomic data visualisations on immersive devices such as a Virtual Reality (VR) environment. The VR technology will allow clinicians, biologists, and computer scientists to explore a cohort of individual patients within the 3D environment. However, demonstrating the feasibility of the VR prototype needs domain users' feedback for future user-centred design and a better cognitive model of human-computer interactions. There is limited research work for collecting and integrating domain knowledge into the prototype design.

objectiveA usability study for the VR prototype--Virtual Reality to Observe Oncology data Models (VROOM) was implemented. VROOM was designed based on a preliminary study among medical users. The goals of this usability study included establishing a baseline of user experience, validating user performance measures, and identifying potential design improvements that are to be addressed to improve efficiency, functionality, and end-user satisfaction.

methodsThe study was conducted with a group of domain users (10 males, 10 females) with portable VR devices and camera equipment. These domain users included medical users such as clinicians and genetic scientists and computing domain users such as bioinformatics and data analysts. Users were asked to complete routine tasks based on a clinical scenario. Sessions were recorded and analysed to identify potential areas for improvement to the data visual analytics projects in the VR environment. The one-hour usability study included learning VR interaction gestures, running visual analytics tool, and collecting before and after feedback. The feedback was analysed with different methods to measure effectiveness. The statistical method Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyse various task performances among the different participant groups, and multiple data visualisations were created to find insights from questionnaire answers.

resultsThe usability study investigated the feasibility of using VR for genomic data analysis in domain users' daily work. From the feedback, 65% of the participants, especially clinicians (75% of them), indicated that the VR prototype is potentially helpful for domain users' daily work but needed more flexibility, such as allowing them to define their features for machine learning part, adding new patient data, and importing their datasets in a better way. We calculated the engaged time for each task and compared them among different user groups. Computing domain users spent 50% more time exploring the algorithms and datasets than medical domain users. Additionally, the medical domain users engaged in the data visual analytics parts (approximately 20%) longer than the computing domain users.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPhysiciansVirtual RealityComputersFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleClinical Decision-makingGenomic Data AnalysisUsability StudyVirtual RealityVisualisation

Identifiers

PMID38124044
PMCPMC10731816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.