Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38124025›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2023

Characters evolution of Encyclia (Laeliinae-Orchidaceae) reveals a complex pattern not phylogenetically determined: insights from macro- and micromorphology.

Monika M Lipińska, Natalia Olędrzyńska, Magdalena Dudek, Aleksandra M Naczk, Dorota Łuszczek, Peter Szabó, Manfred Speckmaier, Dariusz L Szlachetko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Multi-Evidence Approach to the Systematics of the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monika M LipińskaDepartment of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, Gdańsk, 80308, Poland.
Natalia OlędrzyńskaDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics and Biosystematics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, Gdańsk, 80308, Poland.
Magdalena DudekDepartment of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, Gdańsk, 80308, Poland.
Aleksandra M NaczkDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics and Biosystematics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, Gdańsk, 80308, Poland. aleksandra.naczk@ug.edu.pl.
Dorota ŁuszczekLaboratory of Electron Microscopy, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, Gdańsk, 80308, Poland.
Peter SzabóIndividual Researcher, Vasvár, 9800, Hungary.
Manfred SpeckmaierBotanischer Garten, Universität Wien, Rennweg 14/2, Raum G-10, Vienna, 1030, Austria.
Dariusz L SzlachetkoDepartment of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, Gdańsk, 80308, Poland.

Funding

Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk 531-D110-D585-23UGrants-first, University of Gdańsk 533-D000-GF73-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encyclia is the second-largest genus in the neotropical subtribe Laeliinae (Orchidaceae) and has more than 150 species, which are characterized by fairly consistent flower morphology. Its taxonomy and species boundaries, however, seem to be still under debate. In the present study, we first examined the lip micromorphology of 61 species of Encyclia sensu stricto. We correlated our results with external flower morphology and phylogenetic analyses performed on a combined dataset that included both nuclear (ITS, Xdh, PhyC) and plastid markers (ycf1, rpl32, and trnL-trnF). Phylogenetic reconstruction showed that Encyclia sensu stricto species form a coherent, monophyletic group. However, it is difficult to determine the relationships between the different groups within one larger clade. The groups all form distinct lineages that evolved from a common ancestor. The UPGMA cluster analysis for the seven qualitative micromorphological features clearly divides the genus into two main groups, the larger of which is further subdivided into two subgroups. None of these, however, overlap with any of the phylogeographic units distinguished in previously published papers or in presented article. It is worth noting that the groups resulting from the UPGMA analysis cannot be defined by macromorphological features. The pattern of similarities between species, taking into account both macro- and micromorphological features, is eminently mosaic in nature, and only a multifaceted approach can explain this enigmatic group.

Indexed as

OrchidaceaeFlowersPhylogenyPlastidsAnatomyEpidermisLaeliinaeMorphologyNeotropicsOrchidsTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID38124025
PMCPMC10731901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.