Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38123904›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2024

Development and validation of the Medical Attitudes Towards Deprescribing Questionnaire.

Pasquale Agosti, Barbara D'Avanzo, Igor Monti, Laura Cortesi, Alessandro Nobili, Mauro Tettamanti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pasquale AgostiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, and Fondazione Luigi Villa, Milan, Italy.
Barbara D'AvanzoDepartment of Health Policy, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche, Milan, Italy. barbara.davanzo@marionegri.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0361-7263
Igor MontiDepartment of Health Policy, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche, Milan, Italy.
Laura CortesiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro NobiliDepartment of Health Policy, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche, Milan, Italy.
Mauro TettamantiDepartment of Health Policy, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche, Milan, Italy.
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute Bando Ricerca Corrente (RC2022)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypharmacy and inappropriate prescriptions in the elderly are widely discussed themes in scientific literature. Although more and more studies showed the safety and feasibility of deprescribing strategies, these are not implemented in clinical practice. In order to measure the attitudes of Italian doctors towards deprescribing and address their awareness, experiences, difficulties in applying these strategies and potential suggestions, we aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire, the Medical Attitudes Towards Deprescribing Questionnaire (MATD-Q). Between November 2017 and October 2018 an e-mail was sent to internists, geriatricians and general practitioners, to invite them to connect to a platform and answer to the questionnaire, consisting in 38 items (with a five level score) and five questions. After 2-3 weeks, a second e-mail was sent for a second completion of the questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was assessed by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The correlations between items were assessed by means of Pearson linear correlation coefficients and Cronbach Alpha was used to assess internal consistency. A total of 77 questionnaires completed twice were collected. By a principal component analysis we defined a smaller set of variables (n = 12), which resulted to be representative of the 38-item questionnaire.The final version of the questionnaire we developed (MATDQ-12), after validation in other cohorts, could be a useful tool to measure the efficacy of educational interventions aimed at improving the attitude of physicians towards deprescribing strategies with the final goal to allow their implementation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsPhysiciansAgedHumansPolypharmacyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesDeprescribingElderlyInappropriate medicationsPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID38123904
OpenAlexW4390053607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.