Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38123876›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2023

Two resected cases of benign adenomyoepithelioma.

Yurika Fukudome, Yoshika Nagata, Yui Yamada, Toshihiro Saeki, Takahisa Fujikawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yurika FukudomeDepartment of Surgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, 3-2-1 Asano, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu City, Fukuoka, 802-8555, Japan.
Yoshika NagataDepartment of Surgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, 3-2-1 Asano, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu City, Fukuoka, 802-8555, Japan. y-nagata@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp.
Yui YamadaDepartment of Pathology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, 3-2-1 Asano, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu City, Fukuoka, 802-8555, Japan.
Toshihiro SaekiDepartment of Surgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, 3-2-1 Asano, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu City, Fukuoka, 802-8555, Japan.
Takahisa FujikawaDepartment of Surgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, 3-2-1 Asano, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu City, Fukuoka, 802-8555, Japan.
Kokura Memorial Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast is an uncommon tumor characterized by the proliferation of ductal epithelial and myoepithelial cells with the heterogeneity. Although benign AME is relatively easy to differentiate from breast cancer by core needle biopsy (CNB) alone, a definitive diagnosis is often difficult. The imaging findings of AME are also variable, and there are particularly few reports about radiological features, including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in AME. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two cases of benign AME. Case 1 is a 30-year-old woman with a history of asthma. The cystic tumor shows smooth borders, and the intracystic solid component is irregular in shape and high vascularity. The pathological findings of the tumor were benign on CNB. The MRI scan showed a decreased ADC value. Case 2 is a 60-year-old woman with only a history of arrhythmia. The tumor shows a lobulated mass with cystic space and coarse calcifications. The pathological findings of the tumor were found to be benign by CNB. Dynamic MRI scan showed a fast washout pattern with a decreased ADC value. Both patients underwent excisional biopsy to confirm the diagnosis, and the pathological diagnosis was benign AME in both cases.

conclusionsThe AME of the breast has little specific imaging information, so it can be difficult to diagnose based on pathological findings of biopsy specimen. In our case, the ADC values were exceptionally low, contrary to previous reports. It is essential to carefully diagnose AME, considering the discrepancies in imaging findings observed in this case.

Indexed as

AdenomyoepitheliomaApparent diffusion coefficientBreastSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID38123876
PMCPMC10733238
OpenAlexW4390033572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.