Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38123873›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2023

Recombinant human endostatin as a potential anti-angiogenic agent: therapeutic perspective and current status.

J Anakha, Prakashkumar Dobariya, Shyam Sunder Sharma, Abhay H Pande

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J AnakhaDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-8808
Prakashkumar DobariyaDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-6518
Shyam Sunder SharmaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4221-4870
Abhay H PandeDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India. apande@niper.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-539X
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research · INNational Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) - Ahmedabad · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is the physiological process that results in the formation of new blood vessels develop from pre-existing vasculature and plays a significant role in several physiological and pathological processes. Inhibiting angiogenesis, a crucial mechanism in the growth and metastasis of cancer, has been proposed as a potential anticancer therapy. Different studies showed the beneficial effects of angiogenesis inhibitors either in patients suffering from different cancers, alone or in combination with conventional therapies. Even though there are currently a number of efficient anti-angiogenic drugs, including monoclonal antibodies and kinase inhibitors, the associated toxicity profile and their affordability constraints are prompting researchers to search for a safe and affordable angiostatic agent for cancer treatment. Endostatin is one of the endogenous anti-angiogenic candidates that have been extensively pursued for the treatment of cancer, but even over three decades after its discovery, we have not made much advancement in employing it as an anticancer therapeutic despite of its remarkable anti-angiogenic effect with low toxicity profile. A recombinant human endostatin (rh-Es) variant for non-small cell lung cancer was approved by China in 2006 and has since been used effectively. Several other successful clinical trials related to endostatin for various malignancies are either ongoing or have already been completed with promising results. Thus, in this review, we have provided an overview of existing anti-angiogenic drugs developed for cancer therapy, with a summary of tumour angiogenesis in the context of Endostatin, and clinical status of rh-Es in cancer treatment. Furthermore, we briefly discuss the various strategies to improve endostatin features (poor pharmacokinetic properties) for developing rh-Es as a safe and effective agent for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsEndostatinsHumansNeovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis InhibitorsEndostatinsAngiogenesisCancerEndostarEndostatinFusion protein engineering

Identifiers

PMID38123873
OpenAlexW4390057242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.