Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38123829›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023

Endograft position and endoleak detection after endovascular abdominal aortic repair with low-field tiltable MRI: a feasibility study.

Jordy K van Zandwijk, Richte C L Schuurmann, Bennie Ten Haken, Chrit M Stassen, Robert H Geelkerken, Jean-Paul P M de Vries, Frank F J Simonis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jordy K van ZandwijkMagnetic Detection & Imaging, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. j.k.vanzandwijk@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6393-0139
Richte C L SchuurmannDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bennie Ten HakenMagnetic Detection & Imaging, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Chrit M StassenDepartment of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Robert H GeelkerkenDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jean-Paul P M de VriesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frank F J SimonisMagnetic Detection & Imaging, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Medisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Twente · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbdominal aortic endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair might be position-dependent, therefore undetectable using supine imaging. We aimed to determine the feasibility and benefit of using a low-field tiltable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner allowing to study patients who can be imaged in both supine and upright positions of endoleaks.

methodsTen EVAR patients suspected of endoleak based on ultrasound examination were prospectively included. MRI in upright and supine positions was compared with routine supine computed tomography angiography (CTA). Analysis was performed through (1) subjective image quality assessment by three observers, (2) landmark registration between MRI and CTA scans, (3) Euclidean distances between renal and endograft landmarks, and (4) evaluation of endoleak detection on MRI by a consensus panel. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance.

resultsThe image quality of upright/supine MRI was inferior compared to CTA. Median differences in both renal and endograft landmarks were approximately 6-7 mm between upright and supine MRI and 5-6 mm between supine MRI and CTA. In the proximal sealing zone of the endograft, no differences were found among all three scan types (p = 0.264). Endoleak detection showed agreement between MRI and CTA in 50% of the cases, with potential added value in only one patient.

conclusionsThe benefit of low-field upright MRI for endoleak detection was limited. While MRI assessment was non-inferior to standard CTA in detecting endoleaks in selected cases, improved hardware and sequences are needed to explore the potential of upright MRI in patients with endoleaks. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Upright low-field MRI has limited clinical value in detecting position-dependent endoleaks; improvements are required to fulfil its potential as a complementary modality in this clinical setting. KEY POINTS: • Upright MRI shows potential for imaging endoleaks in aortic aneurysm patients in different positions. • The image quality of upright MRI is inferior to current techniques. • Upright MRI complements CTA, but lacks accurate deformation measurements for clinical use. • Advancements in hardware and imaging sequences are needed to fully utilise upright MRI capabilities.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresAortographyEndoleakEndovascular Aneurysm RepairFeasibility StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTreatment OutcomeAortic aneurysm (abdominal)EndoleakMagnetic resonance imagingStanding positionSupine position

Identifiers

PMID38123829
PMCPMC10733271
OpenAlexW4390029541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.