Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38123810›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023

Dissecting the heterogeneity of "in the wild" stress from multimodal sensor data.

Sujay Nagaraj, Sarah Goodday, Thomas Hartvigsen, Adrien Boch, Kopal Garg, Sindhu Gowda, Luca Foschini, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Stephen Friend, Anna Goldenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. CRoP: Context-wise Robust Static Human-Sensing Personalization.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2025
    Article
  7. Beyond Detection: Towards Actionable Sensing Research in Clinical Mental Healthcare.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Sujay NagarajDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. s.nagaraj@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8231-7305
Sarah Goodday4YouandMe, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thomas HartvigsenSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-2792
Adrien BochEvidation Health Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Kopal GargDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sindhu GowdaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Luca FoschiniSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-3570
Marzyeh GhassemiVector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephen Friend4YouandMe, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anna GoldenbergDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CACanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAEvidation Health (United States) · USIIT@MIT · USSage Bionetworks · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress is associated with numerous chronic health conditions, both mental and physical. However, the heterogeneity of these associations at the individual level is poorly understood. While data generated from individuals in their day-to-day lives "in the wild" may best represent the heterogeneity of stress, gathering these data and separating signals from noise is challenging. In this work, we report findings from a major data collection effort using Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) and frontline healthcare workers. We provide insights into stress "in the wild", by using robust methods for its identification from multimodal data and quantifying its heterogeneity. Here we analyze data from the Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Workers study following 365 frontline healthcare workers for 4-6 months using wearable devices and smartphone app-based measures. Causal discovery is used to learn how the causal structure governing an individual's self-reported symptoms and physiological features from DHTs differs between non-stress and potential stress states. Our methods uncover robust representations of potential stress states across a population of frontline healthcare workers. These representations reveal high levels of inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity in stress. We leverage multiple stress definitions that span different modalities (from subjective to physiological) to obtain a comprehensive view of stress, as these differing definitions rarely align in time. We show that these different stress definitions can be robustly represented as changes in the underlying causal structure on and off stress for individuals. This study is an important step toward better understanding potential underlying processes generating stress in individuals.

Identifiers

PMID38123810
PMCPMC10733336
OpenAlexW4390037992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.