ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2024
Targeting optimal protein delivery in parenteral and enteral nutrition for preterm infants: a review of randomized, controlled trials.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationships of Early Parenteral Nutrition and Human Milk Fortification on the Growth of Neonates With Birth Weights Between 1500 and 1750 g.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2026Article
- Formula protein versus human milk protein and the effects on growth in preterm born infants.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2025Review
- Evidence-based nutrition for the very preterm infant in 2024.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Close attention to nutritional management is essential for optimizing growth and neurodevelopment of the preterm infant. Protein intake and the protein to energy ratio are the main determinants of growth and body composition. Yet large, multi-center, randomized controlled trials are lacking to guide protein delivery for the preterm infant. Until these studies are pursued, smaller trials must be used to inform clinical practice. This review summarizes the randomized controlled trials that have been performed to test the impact of higher vs. lower protein delivery to the preterm infant. We consider the trials that varied protein delivery rates during parenteral and enteral phases of nutrition. Considerable heterogeneity exists across study designs. Still, cumulative evidence from these trials provides a framework for current recommendations for protein intake in the preterm infant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.