Observational studyBreast cancer research and treatment2024
Comparison of cisplatin-based versus standard preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer: propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.
Observational study in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Responsiveness of Breast Cancer Cells to Varied Levels of Vitamin B12, Cisplatin, and G-CSF.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Targeted therapy approaches for epithelial-mesenchymal transition in triple negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe efficacy of carboplatin is non-equivalent to that of cisplatin (CDDP) for various tumor types in curative settings. However, the role of CDDP in operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients remains unknown. We conducted a multicenter observational study to examine the effects of CDDP added to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with TNBC.
methodsThis retrospective study consecutively included previously untreated patients with stage I-III TNBC treated with preoperative chemotherapy with or without CDDP. The primary endpoint was distant disease-free survival (DDFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to minimize confounding biases in comparisons between the two groups.
resultsA total of 138 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, 52 were in the CDDP group and 86 in the non-CDDP group. DDFS was significantly better in the CDDP group than in the non-CDDP group (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.127 and p < 0.001, PSM HR 0.141 and p < 0.003, IPTW HR 0.123 and p = < 0.001). Furthermore, among the patients with residual cancer burden (RCB) class II/III, DDFS was better in the CDDP group than in the non-CDDP group (unadjusted HR 0.192 and p = 0.013, PSM HR 0.237 and p = 0.051, IPTW HR 0.124 and p = 0.059).
conclusionOur study showed that CDDP-containing regimens achieved favorable prognoses in patients with operable TNBC, especially for the RCB class II/III population. Confirmative studies are warranted to elucidate the role of CDDP in TNBC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.