ArticleSpinal cord2024
Pulmonary function and sarcopenia as predictors of dysphagia in cervical spinal cord injury.
Article in Spinal cord, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Risk Factors associated with dysphagia for people with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (cSCI): A Systematic review and Meta-analysis.Spinal cord · 2026Review
- Accuracy of Balloons and Handheld Spirometers as Low-Cost Tools for Measuring Vital Capacity and Air Volume: A Laboratory-Based Validation Study.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study.
objectiveTo determine the risk factors associated with dysphagia in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) and analyze the differences between individuals with improved penetration-aspiration (PA) and persistent PA on follow-up.
settingTertiary inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
methodsMedical records of individuals with CSCI admitted between December 2009 and February 2023 who underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for dysphagia. Differences between individuals with improved PA and persistent PA were analyzed using an independent t-test.
resultsIn total, 149 participants were enrolled. Age (odds ratio (OR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.12), percentage of forced vital capacity to predicted normal (FVC (% predicted)) (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), and skeletal muscle index (OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.79-0.99) were significant factors associated with the risk of PA. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off values for age, FVC (% predicted), and skeletal muscle index were determined as 56.0, 45.7, and 41.0, respectively. A secondary analysis of the follow-up VFSS was conducted on 38 participants. The follow-up FVC (% predicted) and degree of weight loss differed significantly between the improved PA and persistent PA groups.
conclusionsOlder age, low FVC (% predicted), and low skeletal muscle index can be predictors of dysphagia in patients with CSCI. On follow-up VFSS, individuals with improved PA demonstrated greater improvement in FVC (% predicted).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.