ArticleScientific reports2023
Analysis of factors associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment of testicular torsion in 1005 cases from Chongqing city, China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is It Too Late? Machine Learning for Predicting Orchiectomy Versus Testicular Preservation in Acute Torsion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Are we still too late to preserve the testes? A global survey of delayed consultation and risk factors for testicular torsion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Development of a nomogram to predict risk factors for orchiectomy after testicular torsion in children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differences in Clinical Outcomes and Patients' Characteristics Between Childhood and Adolescent Testicular Torsion.Cureus · 2024Article
- Integrative analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics reveals the protective effect and mechanism of salidroside on testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the clinical and social factors of delayed treatment for testicular torsion (TT) and to explore the risk factors of testicular excision in China. The clinical data of 1005 patients with TT who were admitted to 48 medical institutions in Chongqing city (China) from January 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. It was revealed that the misdiagnosis rates of non-senior (junior and middle) grade doctors and senior doctors were 25.1% and 9.6%, respectively. The proportion of TT patients who received timely treatment (within 6 h after onset of symptoms) was 23.8%. The results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that absent cremasteric reflex was a protective factor for delayed surgery of more than 6 h from onset of symptoms to surgery. Misdiagnosis, consultation with a non-urologist as the first consultant doctor, absence blood flow in color Doppler ultrasound, negative high-riding testis findings, the presence of fever, and non-manual detorsion were identified as risk factors associated with delayed surgery (more than 6 h from the onset of symptoms) for TT. Furthermore, misdiagnosis, non-urologist first-consultant doctor, absent blood flow in DUS, non-manual detorsion, fever, degree of cord twisting > 180, and the initial diagnosis in tertiary hospitals were risk factors for orchidectomy. Having TT on the right side, and the presence of nausea and vomiting were identified as protective factors for orchidectomy. Technical training in the diagnosis and treatment of TT should be extended to primary hospitals and doctors to significantly improve their accuracy in managing this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.