Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38123594›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Anodal cerebellar t-DCS impacts skill learning and transfer on a robotic surgery training task.

Guido Caccianiga, Ronan A Mooney, Pablo A Celnik, Gabriela L Cantarero, Jeremy D Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guido CaccianigaLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 21218, USA. caccianiga@is.mpg.de.
Ronan A MooneyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, John Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, 21218, USA.
Pablo A CelnikDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, John Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, 21218, USA.
Gabriela L CantareroDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, John Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, 21218, USA.
Jeremy D BrownDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 21218, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum has demonstrated a critical role during adaptation in motor learning. However, the extent to which it can contribute to the skill acquisition of complex real-world tasks remains unclear. One particularly challenging application in terms of motor activities is robotic surgery, which requires surgeons to complete complex multidimensional visuomotor tasks through a remotely operated robot. Given the need for high skill proficiency and the lack of haptic feedback, there is a pressing need for understanding and improving skill development. We investigated the effect of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation applied during the execution of a robotic surgery training task. Study participants received either real or sham stimulation while performing a needle driving task in a virtual (simulated) and a real-world (actual surgical robot) setting. We found that cerebellar stimulation significantly improved performance compared to sham stimulation at fast (more demanding) execution speeds in both virtual and real-world training settings. Furthermore, participants that received cerebellar stimulation more effectively transferred the skills they acquired during virtual training to the real world. Our findings underline the potential of non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance skill learning and transfer in real-world relevant tasks and, more broadly, its potential for improving complex motor learning.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresTranscranial Direct Current StimulationCerebellumHumansLearningMotor Skills

Identifiers

PMID38123594
PMCPMC10733429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.