ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025
Verifying the Accuracy of Hemodynamic Analysis Using High Spatial Resolution 3D Phase-contrast MR Imaging on a 7T MR System: Comparison with a 3T System.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHemodynamics is important in the initiation, growth, and rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Since intracranial aneurysms are small, a high-field MR system with high spatial resolution and high SNR is desirable for this hemodynamic analysis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the accuracy of MR fluid dynamic (MRFD) results based on 3D phase-contrast MR (3D PC MR, non-electrocardiogram[ECG]-gated 4D Flow MRI) data from a human cerebrovascular phantom and human healthy subjects obtained by a 7T MR system was superior to those by a 3T MR system.
methods3D PC MR and 3D time of flight MR angiography (3D TOF MRA) imaging were performed on a 3T MR system and a 7T MR system for a human cerebrovascular phantom and 10 healthy human subjects, and MRFD analysis was performed using these data. The MRFD results from each MR system were then compared with the following items based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results: 3D velocity vector field; correlation coefficient (R), angular similarity index (ASI), and magnitude similarity index (MSI) of blood flow velocity vectors.
resultsIn the MRFD results of 3D velocity vectors of the cerebrovascular phantom, noise-like vectors were observed near the vascular wall on the 3T MR system, but no noise was observed on the 7T MR system, showing results similar to those of CFD. In the MRFD results of the cerebrovascular phantom and healthy subjects, the correlation coefficients R, ASI, and MSI of the 7T MR system were higher than those of the 3T MR system, and ASI and MSI of healthy human subjects were significantly different between the two systems.
conclusionsThe accuracy of high spatial resolution MRFD using the 7T MR system exceeded that of the 3T MR system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.