Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38118384›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of otolaryngology

Tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment: Insurance coverage, gaps, and barriers.

Palmer L Foran, William J Benjamin, Ethan D Sperry, Simon R Best, Sarah E Boisen, Barbara Bosworth, Martin B Brodsky, David Shaye, Michael J Brenner, Vinciya Pandian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of otolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Redefining Nursing in Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Care: Implications of the ICN's 2025 Definitions for an Evolving Specialty.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Palmer L ForanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
William J BenjaminUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Ethan D SperryUniversity of Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Simon R BestDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sarah E BoisenPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States.
Barbara BosworthUniversity of Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Martin B BrodskyHead and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Physical and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
David ShayeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School Massachusetts Eye and Ear, United States.
Michael J BrennerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Global Tracheostomy Collaborative, Raleigh, NC, United States; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Vinciya PandianCenter for Immersive Learning and Digital Innovation Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States; Global Tracheostomy Collaborative, Raleigh, NC, United States; Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: vpandia1@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USCleveland Clinic · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Symptoms Assessment and Screening for Laryngeal Injury Post-extubation in ICUR01NR017433 · NINR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BRODSKY, MARTIN BRUCE, NEEDHAM, DALE MURRAY · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Therapeutic DNA vaccine for Recurrent Respiratory PapillomatosisK23DC014758 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEST, SIMON R · 2016 to 2021
$1.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC014758NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTracheostomy care is supply- and resource-intensive, and airway-related adverse events in community settings have high rates of readmission and mortality. Devices are often implicated in harm, but little is known about insurance coverage, gaps, and barriers to obtaining tracheostomy-related medically necessary durable medical equipment. We aimed to identify barriers patients may encounter in procuring tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment through insurance plan coverage. MATERIALS AND

methodsTracheostomy-related durable medical equipment provisions were evaluated across insurers, extracting data via structured telephone interviews and web-based searches. Each insurance company was contacted four times and queried iteratively regarding the range of coverage and co-pay policies. Outcome measures include call duration, consistency of explanation of benefits, and the number of transfers and disconnects. We also identified six qualitative themes from patient interviews.

resultsTracheostomy-related durable medical equipment coverage was offered in some form by 98.1 % (53/54) of plans across 11 insurers studied. Co-pays or deductibles were required in 42.6 % (23/54). There was significant variability in out-of-pocket expenditures. Fixed co-pays ranged from $0-30, and floating co-pays ranged from 0 to 40 %. During phone interviews, mean call duration was 19 ± 10 min, with an average of 2 ± 1 transfers between agents. Repeated calls revealed high information variability (mean score 2.4 ± 1.5). Insurance sites proved challenging to navigate, scoring poorly on usability, literacy, and information quality.

conclusionsSeveral factors may limit access to potentially life-saving durable medical equipment for patients with tracheostomy. Barriers include out-of-pocket expenditures, lack of transparency on coverage, and low-quality information. Further research is necessary to evaluate patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Durable Medical EquipmentTracheostomyHumansInsurance CoverageAdverse eventsDurable medical equipment (DME)Healthcare accessHome careInsurancePatient-centered careTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID38118384
PMCPMC10939813
OpenAlexW4389622718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.