ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2024
Molecular simulations integrated with experiments for probing the interaction dynamics and binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered protein regions enable biophysical interpretation of variant-effect predictors.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Dynamic yet well-defined organization of the FUS RGG3 dense phase.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- DisProt in 2026: enhancing intrinsically disordered proteins accessibility, deposition, and annotation.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Decoding intrinsically disordered regions in biomolecular condensates.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Protein-Ligand Interactions: Recent Advances in Biophysics, Biochemistry, and Bioinformatics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Report of the 5th International Symposium on Frontiers in Molecular Science (ISFMS 2025).International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Biological insights from integrative modeling of intrinsically disordered protein systems.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- Current perspectives in drug targeting intrinsically disordered proteins and biomolecular condensates.BMC biology · 2025Review
- Bridging the gap: From petri dish to patient - Advancements in translational drug discovery.Heliyon · 2025Review
- Coil-Library-Derived Amino-Acid-Specific Side-Chain χJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) exploit their plasticity to deploy a rich panoply of soft interactions and binding phenomena. Advances in tailoring molecular simulations for IDPs combined with experimental cross-validation offer an atomistic view of the mechanisms that control IDP binding, function, and dysfunction. The emerging theme is that unbound IDPs autonomously form transient local structures and self-interactions that determine their binding behavior. Recent results have shed light on whether and how IDPs fold, stay disordered or drive condensation upon binding; how they achieve binding specificity and select among competing partners. The disorder-binding paradigm is now being proactively used by researchers to target IDPs for rational drug design and engineer molecular responsive elements for biosensing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.