ArticleUrology practice2024
The Current Status of Palliative Care, Hospice, and End-of-Life Health Care Utilization in Patients With Malignant Ureteral Obstruction.
Article in Urology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging urology and palliative care: a narrative review of current practice and evolving priorities.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMalignant ureteral obstruction is associated with a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 3 to 7 months. These patients are ideal candidates for concurrent palliative care services, consistent with American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. We aimed to characterize palliative care, hospice, and end-of-life health care utilization in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction.
methodsPatients ≥ 18 years old at our institution and diagnosed with malignant ureteral obstruction between May 2014 and August 2020 were retrospectively identified and pertinent data extracted. Palliative care, hospice, and end-of-life health care utilization was described, and factors associated with each were assessed with logistic regression models. Overall survival was assessed with Cox proportional hazard regression models.
resultsOne hundred fifteen patients qualified for analysis; 39.1% (45/115) utilized palliative care and spent a median of 12.5 days (IQR 3-52 days) on nonhospice palliative care. On adjusted analysis Black ethnicity (aOR 3.44, 95% CI: 1.08-10.94) was associated with palliative care utilization. Of the patients, 53.9% (62/115) utilized hospice. The median time from hospice initiation to death was 12 days (IQR 5-23 days). On adjusted analysis, prior extirpative surgery (aOR 3.63, 95% CI 1.01-13.05) and palliative care utilization (aOR 4.38, 95% CI 1.70-11.31) were associated with hospice utilization. Median survival following diagnosis was 141 days (IQR 37.5-442.5). Of the patients, 43.0% (37/86) had high end-of-life health care utilization. On multivariable analysis, only hospice (aOR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.14) was associated with less end-of-life health care utilization.
conclusionsPalliative care is underutilized in malignant ureteral obstruction. Hospice, but not palliative care utilization, was associated with decreased end-of-life health care utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.