Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117795›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Biofertilizers from wastewater treatment as a potential source of mineral nutrients for growth of amaranth plants.

Elisa Teófilo Ferreira, Sarah Corrêa Barrochelo, Sarah de Paula de Melo, Thainá Araujo, Augusto Cesar Coelho Xavier, Inês Cechin, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa Teófilo FerreiraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8168-9270
Sarah Corrêa BarrocheloDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-5739
Sarah de Paula de MeloDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil.
Thainá AraujoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil.
Augusto Cesar Coelho XavierDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil.
Inês CechinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8168-9270
Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro da SilvaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engeneering, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0741-8966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploring alternative fertilizers is crucial in agriculture due to the cost and environmental impact of inorganic options. This study investigated the potential of sewage-derived biofertilizers on the growth and physiology of Amaranthus cruentus plants. Various treatments were compared, including control treatments with inorganic fertilizer and treatments with biofertilizers composed of microalgae, biosolids and reclaimed water. The following traits were investigated: photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange, growth, and leaf nutrient concentrations. The results showed that the concentrations of N, P, Cu, Fe Zn and Na nutrients, in the dry microalgae and biosolids, were quite high for the needs of the plants. The wet microalgae presented high concentration of Cu, Fe and Zn nutrients while reclaimed water contained high concentration of N, K, Ca and S. Na and Zn nutrients increased in the leaf of plants treated with dry microalgae and biosolid, respectively. At the beginning of the flowering phase, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents were lower for plants grown with wet microalgae while for plants grown with higher doses of biosolid or reclaimed water total chlorophyll was increased, and carotenoids were not affected. Lower photosynthetic pigments under wet microalgae resulted in lower photosynthetic rates. On the other hand, amendments with dry microalgae and biosolid increased photosynthetic rates with the biosolid being the most effective. Higher applications of biosolid, wet and dry microalgae produced a considerable increase in shoot biomass of amaranth, with the dry microalgae being the most effective. Additionally, reclaimed water obtained after tertiary treatment of sewage with microalgae and biosolids applied alone showed promising effects on plant growth. Overall, these findings suggest that organic fertilizers derived from sewage treatment have the potential to enhance plant growth and contribute to sustainable agricultural practices.

Indexed as

AmaranthusWater PurificationBiosolidsCarotenoidsChlorophyllFertilizersMineralsNutrientsPlantsSewageWaterBiosolidsCarotenoidsChlorophyllFertilizersMineralsNutrientsSewageWater

Identifiers

PMID38117795
PMCPMC10732379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.