Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117762›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Nontoxic effects of thymol, carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, and garlic oil on dung beetles: A potential alternative to ecotoxic anthelmintics.

José R Verdú, Vieyle Cortez, Rocío Rosa-García, Antonio J Ortiz, Urcesino García-Prieto, Jean-Pierre Lumaret, Carmelo García Romero, Francisco Sánchez-Piñero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

José R VerdúResearch Institute CIBIO (Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad), Science Park, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-8341
Vieyle CortezResearch Institute CIBIO (Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad), Science Park, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Rocío Rosa-GarcíaSERIDA - Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain.
Antonio J OrtizDepartamento de Química Inorgánica y Química Orgánica, Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas, Jaén, Spain.
Urcesino García-PrietoSERIDA - Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain.
Jean-Pierre LumaretLaboratoire Zoogéographie, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France.
Carmelo García RomeroSociedad Española de Agricultura Ecológica (SEAE), Escuela Capataces Agrícolas, Catarroja, Valencia, Spain.
Francisco Sánchez-PiñeroDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario · ESUniversity of Alicante · ESUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de Jaén · ESUniversité Paul-Valéry Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sustainability of the traditional extensive livestock sector will only be possible if healthy dung-decomposing insect communities are preserved. However, many current pharmaceutical anthelmintics are harmful to dung beetles, their presence can have a negative impact on biological systems. Phytochemical anthelmintics are an alternative to ecotoxic synthetic pharmaceutical anthelmintics, although ecotoxicological tests of their possible indirect effects on dung beetles are required to demonstrate their viability. In this study, the potential ecotoxicity of thymol, carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil (diallyl disulfide and diallyl trisulfide) were tested for the first time. Inhibition of antennal response was measured as a relevant parameter by obtaining relevant toxicity thresholds derived from concentration‒response curves, such as the IC50. All phytochemical compounds tested were demonstrated to be suitable alternative candidates to the highly ecotoxic compound ivermectin, considering their non-toxicity to nontarget organisms. Residues of the phytochemical antiparasitics found in cattle droppings were extremely low, even undetectable in the case of diallyl disulfide and diallyl trisulfide. Furthermore, our results showed that none of the phytochemical compounds have ecotoxic effects, even at extremely high concentrations, including those almost 1000 times higher than what is most likely to be found in dung susceptible to ingestion by dung beetles in the field. We can conclude that the four selected phytochemical compounds meet the requirements to be considered reliable alternatives to ecotoxic veterinary medicinal products, such as ivermectin.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsColeopteraAcroleinAllyl CompoundsAnimalsCattleCymenesDisulfidesIvermectinPhytochemicalsSulfidesThymolAcroleinAllyl Compoundsallyl sulfideAnthelminticscarvacrolcinnamaldehydeCymenesdiallyl disulfidediallyl trisulfideDisulfidesIvermectinPhytochemicalsSulfidesThymol

Identifiers

PMID38117762
PMCPMC10732372
OpenAlexW4389990794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.