Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117692›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Routine use of cell salvage during cesarean section: A practice evaluation.

Charlotte Leeson, Molly Jones, Joshua Odendaal, Falguni Choksey, Siobhan Quenby

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cell salvage for the management of postpartum haemorrhage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Feasibility and effectiveness of the novel HemoClear microfiltration cell-salvage system in cesarean sections in South Africa.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Routine use of cell salvage during cesarean section: A practice evaluation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte LeesonDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4735-2452
Molly JonesDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Joshua OdendaalDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Falguni ChokseyUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
Siobhan QuenbyDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
University of Warwick · GBCoventry (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntraoperative cell salvage is a well-documented alternative to donor blood transfusion given the scarcity of donor blood pools and the incumbent risk of allogenic blood transfusion. Its use in obstetrics has been limited by concern over fetal alloimmunization due to the risk of fetomaternal hemorrhage. However, there are a paucity of studies reporting on outcome. The aim of this study was to report on a four-year experience of routine use of intraoperative cell salvage and the impact on subsequent pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a tertiary center retrospective service evaluation cohort study and included all women undergoing cesarean section between December 2014 and November 2018 in a tertiary obstetric unit, identifying women who had reinfusion of intraoperative cell salvage. Data regarding index pregnancy as well as subsequent pregnancies at the hospital were extracted from hospital electronic records. Subsequent pregnancy outcome and maternal antibody status in that pregnancy were collected up until November 2022.

resultsDuring the study period, 6656 cesarean sections were performed, with 436 (6.6%) receiving reinfusion of salvaged blood. The mean volume of reinfused blood was 396 mL. A total of 49 (0.7%) women received donor blood transfusion. Of those who received reinfusion of salvaged blood, 79 (18.1%) women had subsequent pregnancies over the eight-year follow-up period. There was one case (0.23%) of fetal cell alloimmunization demonstrated by the presence of anti-D antibodies on the subsequent pregnancy booking bloods.

conclusionsRoutine intraoperative cell salvage may be used to reduce the need for blood transfusion during cesarean section. The risk of fetal cell alloimmunization in a future pregnancy following reinfusion of intraoperative cell salvage is one in 436. Given an apparent small risk of fetal cell alloimmunization, further work is required to establish the safety profile of intraoperative cell salvage in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionOperative Blood SalvageBlood Transfusion, AutologousCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRetrospective Studiesallogeneic blood transfusionfetal alloimmunizationintraoperative cell salvagepostpartum hemorrhagepregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID38117692
PMCPMC10867391
OpenAlexW4390034612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.