ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023
Holistic Human-Serving Digitization of Health Care Needs Integrated Automated System-Level Assessment Tools.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value operating system: a practical framework to measure outcomes-per-cost at the episode level.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Review
- A scoping review on using real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of mHealth applications.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Collaborative and Cooperative Hospital "In-House" Medical Device Development and Implementation in the AI Age: The European Responsible AI Development (EURAID) Framework Compatible With European Values.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Health technology assessment (HTA) and performance management (PM): a scoping review on the intersecting realms.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- A roadmap for safe, regulation-compliant Living Labs for AI and digital health development.Science advances · 2025Review
- Examining human-AI interaction in real-world healthcare beyond the laboratory.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- CORE-MD clinical risk score for regulatory evaluation of artificial intelligence-based medical device software.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Safe AI-enabled digital health technologies need built-in open feedback.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor on "From Concept to Clinic: Living Labs and Regulatory Sandboxes for Health System Digitalization and the Integration of Innovative Devices Into Clinical Workflows".IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of wage structure and ability on the incentives for practitioners to engage in primary care in China: a mathematical analysis based on the incentive mechanism of heterogeneous practitioners and tripartite evolutionary game.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A transparent and standardized performance measurement platform is needed for on-prescription digital health apps to enable ongoing performance monitoring.PLOS digital health · 2024Review
- FDA launches health care at home initiative to drive equity in digital medical care.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- How can regulation and reimbursement better accommodate flexible suites of digital health technologies?NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Digital health technologies need regulation and reimbursement that enable flexible interactions and groupings.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Augmented non-hallucinating large language models as medical information curators.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Under the Tech Umbrella: Assessing the Landscape of Telemedicine Innovations (Telemechron Study).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital health tools, platforms, and artificial intelligence- or machine learning-based clinical decision support systems are increasingly part of health delivery approaches, with an ever-greater degree of system interaction. Critical to the successful deployment of these tools is their functional integration into existing clinical routines and workflows. This depends on system interoperability and on intuitive and safe user interface design. The importance of minimizing emergent workflow stress through human factors research and purposeful design for integration cannot be overstated. Usability of tools in practice is as important as algorithm quality. Regulatory and health technology assessment frameworks recognize the importance of these factors to a certain extent, but their focus remains mainly on the individual product rather than on emergent system and workflow effects. The measurement of performance and user experience has so far been performed in ad hoc, nonstandardized ways by individual actors using their own evaluation approaches. We propose that a standard framework for system-level and holistic evaluation could be built into interacting digital systems to enable systematic and standardized system-wide, multiproduct, postmarket surveillance and technology assessment. Such a system could be made available to developers through regulatory or assessment bodies as an application programming interface and could be a requirement for digital tool certification, just as interoperability is. This would enable health systems and tool developers to collect system-level data directly from real device use cases, enabling the controlled and safe delivery of systematic quality assessment or improvement studies suitable for the complexity and interconnectedness of clinical workflows using developing digital health technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.