Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117498›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of Esketamine Added to Propofol Sedation on Desaturation and Hypotension in Bidirectional Endoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nan Song, Yi Yang, Zhong Zheng, Wen-Cheng Shi, Ai-Ping Tan, Xi-Sheng Shan, Hong Liu, Lingzhong Meng, Ke Peng, Fu-Hai Ji

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06574945 (Efficacy and Safety of Propofol in Combination With Different Esketamine Doses for Anesthesia During Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
24.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06574945 phase4completednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Propofol in Combination With Different Esketamine Doses for Anesthesia During Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure

TypeinterventionalSponsorQian WuRan2022 to 2022Enrolled90ConditionsEsketamine, Loop Electrosurgical Excision, PropofolArmsintravenous injection of propofol only, intravenous injection of propofol +esketamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Ciprofol-Esketamine Versus Ciprofol-Remifentanil in Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Comparison of the EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  20. Trial

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nan SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yi YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Zhong ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taicang First People's Hospital, Taicang, Jiangsu, China.
Wen-Cheng ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taicang First People's Hospital, Taicang, Jiangsu, China.
Ai-Ping TanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xi-Sheng ShanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hong LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento.
Lingzhong MengDepartment of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Ke PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Fu-Hai JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Soochow University · CNTaizhou First People's Hospital · CNThe Fifth People’s Hospital of Suzhou · CNIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Propofol sedation is widely used for endoscopic procedures, but it poses risks of hemodynamic and respiratory depression. The addition of esketamine as an adjuvant may reduce propofol requirements and associated adverse events. Objective: To evaluate the effects of low-dose esketamine added to propofol-based sedation on desaturation and hypotension during same-visit bidirectional endoscopy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial assessed patients from 3 teaching hospitals in China who were scheduled for same-visit bidirectional endoscopy between February 8 and November 30, 2022, and randomly assigned to receive esketamine or normal saline (placebo). Interventions: After induction of sedation with 0.1 μg/kg of sufentanil and 0.5 mg/kg of propofol, patients in the esketamine group received 0.15 mg/kg of intravenous esketamine, whereas patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of saline. Sedation was achieved through propofol titration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the composite of desaturation and hypotension during the procedures. Secondary outcomes included desaturation, hypotension, propofol requirements, postprocedure pain and fatigue, nausea or vomiting, dizziness or headache, hallucination or nightmare, endoscopist satisfaction, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among the 663 initially enrolled patients, 660 completed the study (median [IQR] age, 48 [36-57] years; 355 [53.8%] female), with 331 randomized to the esketamine group and 329 to the placebo group. The administration of esketamine compared with placebo significantly reduced the incidence of the composite outcome of desaturation and hypotension (8.2% vs 21.0%; difference, -12.8 percentage points; odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.54; P < .001). Additionally, esketamine led to significantly lower incidences of desaturation (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.72; false discovery rate q = .01) and hypotension (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.60; q < .001) and reduced propofol requirements (difference, -58.9 mg; 95% CI, -65.7 to -52.2 mg; q < .001), without significant effects on other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing same-visit bidirectional endoscopy, the administration of low-dose esketamine resulted in an approximately 61% reduction in the incidence of desaturation and hypotension, accompanied by decreased propofol requirements. These findings support the use of esketamine as an adjuvant to propofol-based sedation in endoscopic procedures. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200055938.

Indexed as

HypotensionKetaminePropofolAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdultEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdjuvants, ImmunologicEsketamineKetaminePropofol

Identifiers

PMID38117498
PMCPMC10733809
OpenAlexW4389992631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.