Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117467›Full record

ArticleCancer2024

Satisfaction with care, general health, and mental health among sexual and gender minority cancer survivors: Results of the OUT National Cancer Survey.

Charles S Kamen, Umang Gada, Reece Lyerly, N F N Scout

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. "A sweating moment": impact of disclosure in cancer care on LGBTQI patient satisfaction.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Psychological distress and mental health care utilization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A Needs Assessment Approach for Adolescent and Young Adult Sexual and Gender Diverse Cancer Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charles S KamenUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4219-4320
Umang GadaUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Reece LyerlyNational LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
N F N ScoutNational LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
University of Rochester · USProvidence College · USTufts University · US

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Adapting the FOCUS Program for Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) Cancer Patients and CaregiversR34CA283408 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HASTERT, THERESA ANN, KAMEN, CHARLES STEWART · 2023 to 2025
$827k
NCI NIH HHS R34 CA283408NCI NIH HHS R34CA283408NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have attempted to characterize the cancer care experiences and outcomes of sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients with cancer, despite indications that this population experiences disparities across the cancer continuum. The current study used descriptive and exploratory methods to assess factors related to SGM cancer patients' satisfaction with cancer care and self-reported physical and mental health.

methodsThe authors designed a cross-sectional self-report online survey and recruited 3750 SGM cancer patient participants (mixed cancers; 85.6% White; 57% gay, 24% lesbian, 6.7% bisexual, and 6.2% transgender/gender nonbinary) using social media posts, partner organizations, and paid advertisements. They analyzed data using descriptive approaches and exploratory multivariate logistic regression models.

resultsOverall, 70.6% of participants reported feeling satisfied with the cancer care they received, 70% rated their physical health as very good or excellent, and 46% reported experiencing less than 5 days of poor mental health in the last month. In models including all participants, complete cases, and Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC), satisfaction with care was consistently associated with receiving treatment in an SGM welcoming environment. Physical health was consistently associated with having strong social support after cancer. Mental health was consistently associated with feeling safe disclosing SGM identities.

conclusionsSGM cancer patients treated in SGM-welcoming environments were over six times more likely to be satisfied with the care they received than those treated in nonwelcoming environments; this and other modifiable factors could be the target of further study and intervention.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsSexual and Gender MinoritiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMental HealthPersonal SatisfactionSexual Behaviorcancergender identityhealth disparitiessexual and gender minoritiessexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID38117467
PMCPMC10948306
OpenAlexW4390016067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.