ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Driving fatigue detection based on brain source activity and ARMA model.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic cross-domain transfer learning for driver fatigue monitoring: multi-modal sensor fusion with adaptive real-time personalizations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multivariate linear time-series modeling and prediction of cerebral physiologic signals: review of statistical models and implications for human signal analytics.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Review
- Multivariate Modelling and Prediction of High-Frequency Sensor-Based Cerebral Physiologic Signals: Narrative Review of Machine Learning Methodologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Scented Solutions: Examining the Efficacy of Scent Interventions in Mitigating Driving Fatigue.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fatigue among drivers is a significant issue in society, and according to organizational reports, it substantially contributes to accidents. So accurate fatigue detection in drivers plays a crucial role in reducing the number of people fatalities or injured resulting from accidents. Several methods are proposed for fatigue driver recognition among which electroencephalography (EEG) is one. This paper proposed a method for fatigue recognition by EEG signals with extracted features from source and sensor spaces. The proposed method starts with preprocessing by applying filtering and artifact rejection. Then source localization methods are applied to EEG signals for active source extraction. A multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) model is fitted to selected sources, and a dual Kalman filter is applied to estimate the source activity and their relationships. Then multivariate autoregressive moving average (ARMA) is fitted between EEG and source activity signals. Features are extracted from model parameters, source relationship matrix, and wavelet transform of EEG and source activity signals. The novelty of this approach is the use of ARMA model between source activities (as input) and EEG signals (as output) and feature extraction from source relations. Relevant features are selected using a combination of RelifF and neighborhood component analysis (NCA) methods. Three classifiers, namely k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and naive Bayesian (NB) classifiers, are employed to classify drivers. To improve performance, the final label for fatigue detection is calculated by combining these classifiers using the voting method. The results demonstrate that the proposed method accurately recognizes and classifies fatigued drivers with the ensemble classifiers in comparison with other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.