SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024
Therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive brain stimulation for upper limb motor activity in children and young adults with cerebral palsy and pediatric stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the limb function of stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Trial
- Motor network pre-habilitation by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. A proof-of-concept.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in children with cerebral palsy and to compare the differences in efficacy of different treatment parameters. Computer searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, Vipshop and China Biomedical Literature Database were conducted to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TMS to improve function in children with cerebral palsy. The search period was from the establishment of the database to April 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data information, and the risk of bias was assessed for the included studies using the Cochrane Systematic Evaluation Manual 5.1.0. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata software. A total of 18 studies containing 1675 patients with cerebral palsy were included, and r-TMS did not differ significantly from other treatments in improving language function [MD = 2.80, 95% CI (-1.51, 7.11), Z = 1.27, P = 0.20] after treatment. The results of the reticulated meta-analysis showed the best probability ranking of the effect of three different frequencies of r-TMS on motor function scores in children with cerebral palsy: combined LF-rTMS + HF-rTMS (49.8%) > LF-rTMS (45.6%) > HF-rTMS (4.6%) > conventional rehabilitation (0%). Publication bias showed no significant asymmetry in the inverted funnel plot, but the possibility of publication bias could not be excluded. The results of this study showed that r-TMS was not statistically significant in improving language function in children with cerebral palsy compared to conventional treatment. r-TMS was almost unanimously significantly effective in motor function in children with cerebral palsy according to current literature data, and the combined high- and low-frequency transcranial magnetic therapy was better than low-frequency transcranial magnetic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.