ArticleInsights into imaging2023
Predicting tumor deposits in rectal cancer: a combined deep learning model using T2-MR imaging and clinical features.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges in rectal cancer MRI: from image acquisition to interpretation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- MRI-Based Differentiation of Tumor Deposits and Lymph Node Metastases in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI-assisted compressed sensing MRI improves imaging quality in rectal cancer: a comparative study with conventional acceleration techniques.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTumor deposits (TDs) are associated with poor prognosis in rectal cancer (RC). This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model incorporating T2-MR image and clinical factors for the preoperative prediction of TDs in RC patients. METHODS AND
methodsA total of 327 RC patients with pathologically confirmed TDs status from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively recruited, and the T2-MR images and clinical variables were collected. Patients were randomly split into a development dataset (n = 246) and an independent testing dataset (n = 81). A single-channel DL model, a multi-channel DL model, a hybrid DL model, and a clinical model were constructed. The performance of these predictive models was assessed by using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsThe areas under the curves (AUCs) of the clinical, single-DL, multi-DL, and hybrid-DL models were 0.734 (95% CI, 0.674-0.788), 0.710 (95% CI, 0.649-0.766), 0.767 (95% CI, 0.710-0.819), and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.807-0.898) in the development dataset. The AUC of the hybrid-DL model was significantly higher than the single-DL and multi-DL models (both p < 0.001) in the development dataset, and the single-DL model (p = 0.028) in the testing dataset. Decision curve analysis demonstrated the hybrid-DL model had higher net benefit than other models across the majority range of threshold probabilities.
conclusionsThe proposed hybrid-DL model achieved good predictive efficacy and could be used to predict tumor deposits in rectal cancer. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The proposed hybrid-DL model achieved good predictive efficacy and could be used to predict tumor deposits in rectal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Preoperative non-invasive identification of TDs is of great clinical significance. • The combined hybrid-DL model achieved good predictive efficacy and could be used to predict tumor deposits in rectal cancer. • A preoperative nomogram provides gastroenterologist with an accurate and effective tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.