Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117319›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2024

Status epilepticus in the ICU.

Andrea O Rossetti, Jan Claassen, Nicolas Gaspard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rhythmic and Periodic Patterns and Seizures in Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Navigating diagnostic overlap between seizures and movement disorders: A practical clinical approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Update on acute brain injury.Intensive care medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea O RossettiDepartment of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jan ClaassenDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Nicolas GaspardService de Neurologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. nicolas.gaspard@ulb.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-6723
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

RECONFIG - REcovery of CONsciousness Following Intracerebral hemorrhaGeR01NS106014 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CLAASSEN, JAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Status epilepticus (SE) is a common medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management that follows published guidelines is best suited to improve outcomes, with the most severe cases frequently being managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Diagnosis of convulsive SE can be made without electroencephalography (EEG), but EEG is required to reliably diagnose nonconvulsive SE. Rapidly narrowing down underlying causes for SE is crucial, as this may guide additional management steps. Causes may range from underlying epilepsy to acute brain injuries such as trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and infections. Initial management consists of rapid administration of benzodiazepines and one of the following non-sedating intravenous antiseizure medications (ASM): (fos-)phenytoin, levetiracetam, or valproate; other ASM are increasingly used, such as lacosamide or brivaracetam. SE that continues despite these medications is called refractory, and most commonly treated with continuous infusions of midazolam or propofol. Alternatives include further non-sedating ASM and non-pharmacologic approaches. SE that reemerges after weaning or continues despite management with propofol or midazolam is labeled super-refractory SE. At this step, management may include non-sedating or sedating compounds including ketamine and barbiturates. Continuous video EEG is necessary for the management of refractory and super-refractory SE, as these are almost always nonconvulsive. If possible, management of the underlying cause of seizures is crucial particularly for patients with autoimmune encephalitis. Short-term mortality ranges from 10 to 15% after SE and is primarily related to increasing age, underlying etiology, and medical comorbidities. Refractoriness of treatment is clearly related to outcome with mortality rising from 10% in responsive cases, to 25% in refractory, and nearly 40% in super-refractory SE.

Indexed as

PropofolStatus EpilepticusAnticonvulsantsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMidazolamAnticonvulsantsMidazolamPropofolMortalityOutcomeSecond-lineStatus epilepticusTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38117319
PMCPMC13148734
OpenAlexW4390007983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.