Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117301›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2024

Translational PK-PD/TD modeling of antitumor effects and peripheral neuropathy in gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy from xenograft mice to patients for optimal dose and schedule.

Shinji Kobuchi, Atsuko Morita, Shizuka Jonan, Kikuko Amagase, Yukako Ito

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shinji KobuchiDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, 607-8414, Japan.
Atsuko MoritaDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, 607-8414, Japan.
Shizuka JonanLaboratory of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Kikuko AmagaseLaboratory of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Yukako ItoDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, 607-8414, Japan. yukako@mb.kyoto-phu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6608-4935
Kyoto Pharmaceutical University · JPRitsumeikan University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K06679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) treatment, the standard first-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer, often causes peripheral neuropathy (PN). To develop alternative dosing strategies to avoid severe PN, understanding the relationship between pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics/toxicodynamics (PD/TD) is necessary. We established a PK-PD/TD model of GnP treatment to develop an optimal dose schedule.

methodsA mouse xenograft model of human pancreatic cancer was generated to measure drug concentrations in the plasma and tumor, antitumor effects, and PN after GnP treatment. The Simeoni tumor growth inhibition model with tumor concentrations and empirical indirect response models were used for the PD and TD models, respectively. Clinical outcomes were predicted with reported population estimates of PK parameters in cancer patients.

resultsThe PK-PD/TD model simultaneously described the observed tumor volume and paw withdrawal frequency in the von Frey test. For the standard GnP regimen, the model predicted clinical overall response (75.1%), which was overestimated compared to that in a recent phase II study (42.1%) but lower than the observed disease control rate (96.5%). Model simulation showed that dose reduction to less than 40% GnP dose was not effective; a change of dose schedule from every week for 3 weeks to every 2 weeks was a more favorable approach than dose reduction to 60% every week.

conclusionThe PK-PD/TD model-based translational approach provides a guide for optimal dose determination to avoid severe PN while maintaining antitumor effects during GnP chemotherapy. Further research is needed to enhance its applicability and potential for combination chemotherapy regimens.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesAlbuminsAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsGemcitabineHeterograftsHumansMicePaclitaxelTreatment Outcome130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsGemcitabinePaclitaxelCancer chemotherapyPharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamicsPharmacometricsSupportive therapyTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID38117301
OpenAlexW4390013412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.