Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38117227›Full record

Observational studyEuropean heart journal2024

Oral anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: benefits and risks.

Koshiro Kanaoka, Taku Nishida, Yoshitaka Iwanaga, Michikazu Nakai, Reina Tonegawa-Kuji, Yuichi Nishioka, Tomoya Myojin, Katsuki Okada, Tatsuya Noda, Kengo Kusano and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical outcomes of continuing vs. discontinuing oral anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation ablation: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Residual thromboembolic risk and outcomes of oral anticoagulation discontinuation after atrial fibrillation ablation: a target trial emulation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Reassessing the need for long-term oral anticoagulation following successful atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Review
  7. Compliance to direct oral anticoagulation therapy and clinical outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Discontinuation of Oral Anticoagulation After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation - Are We Ready to Change Clinical Practice in 2026?Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy after atrial fibrillation ablation: the ALONE-AF and OCEAN studies.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessment of Long-Term Use Versus Discontinuation of Direct Oral Anticoagulant After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation-RYOUMA Registry Subanalysis.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Koshiro KanaokaDepartment of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Kishibe-Shimmachi 6-1, Suita, Osaka 564-8565, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7900-7835
Taku NishidaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7025-0310
Yoshitaka IwanagaDepartment of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Kishibe-Shimmachi 6-1, Suita, Osaka 564-8565, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1391-2864
Michikazu NakaiDepartment of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Kishibe-Shimmachi 6-1, Suita, Osaka 564-8565, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2240-1510
Reina Tonegawa-KujiDepartment of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Kishibe-Shimmachi 6-1, Suita, Osaka 564-8565, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-939X
Yuichi NishiokaDepartment of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-3925
Tomoya MyojinDepartment of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3820-6157
Katsuki OkadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-781X
Tatsuya NodaDepartment of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3652-7547
Kengo KusanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5760-9285
Yoshihiro MiyamotoOpen Innovation Center, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1337-0508
Yoshihiko SaitoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-3571
Tomoaki ImamuraDepartment of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1981-9959
Nara Medical University · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

Cardiovascular Diseases from the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular CenterFukuda Foundation for Medical TechnologyIntramural Research Fund 22-6-5Labour Research Grant 22FA1701Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFew recent large-scale studies have evaluated the risks and benefits of continuing oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the status of continuation of OAC therapy and the association between continuation of OAC therapy and thromboembolic and bleeding events according to the CHADS2 score.

methodsThis retrospective study included data from the Japanese nationwide administrative claims database of patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2014 and March 2021. Patients without AF recurrence assessed by administrative data of the treatment modalities were divided into two groups according to continuation of OAC therapy 6 months after the index CA. The primary outcomes were thromboembolism and major bleeding after a landmark period of 6 months. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, the association between OAC continuation and outcomes was determined according to the CHADS2 score.

resultsAmong 231 374 patients included, 69.7%, 21.6%, and 8.7% had CHADS2 scores of ≤1, 2, and ≥3, respectively. Of these, 71% continued OAC therapy at 6 months. The OAC continuation rate was higher in the high CHADS2 score group than that in the low CHADS2 score group. Among all patients, 2451 patients (0.55 per 100 person-years) had thromboembolism and 2367 (0.53 per 100 person-years) had major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≤1 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.01, P = .06] for thromboembolism and was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.27-1.80, P < .001) for major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≥3 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.46-0.82, P = .001) for thromboembolism and was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.71-1.56, P = 0.81) for major bleeding.

conclusionsThis observational study suggests that the benefits and risks of continuing OAC therapy after CA for AF differ based on the patient's CHADS2 score. The risk of major bleeding due to OAC continuation seems to outweigh the risk reduction of thromboembolism in patients with lower thromboembolic risk.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationThromboembolismAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsHemorrhageHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationCHADS2 scoreOral anticoagulation therapy

Identifiers

PMID38117227
PMCPMC10873714
OpenAlexW4390013781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.