Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38116803›Full record

SynthesisJournal of athletic training2025

Oral Rehydration Beverages for Treating Exercise-Associated Dehydration: A Systematic Review, Part I. Carbohydrate-Electrolyte Solutions.

Vere Borra, Niels De Brier, David C Berry, David Zideman, Eunice Singletary, Emmy De Buck, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation First Aid Task Force

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of athletic training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Singapore First Aid Guidelines 2026.Singapore medical journal · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vere BorraCentre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium.
Niels De BrierCentre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium.
David C BerryDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Services, Saginaw Valley State University, MI.
David ZidemanThames Valley Air Ambulance, Stokenchurch, UK.
Eunice SingletaryDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.
Emmy De BuckCentre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium.
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation First Aid Task Force
Rode Kruis-Vlaanderen · BEKU Leuven · BESaginaw Valley State University · USThames Valley Air AmbulanceUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExercise-associated dehydration is a common problem, especially at sporting events. Although recommendations have been made to drink a certain volume per kilogram body mass lost after exercise, no clear guidance about the type of rehydration beverage is available. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of carbohydrate-electrolyte (CE) solutions as a rehydration solution for exercise-associated dehydration. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via the PubMed interface), Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up until June 1, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Controlled trials involving adults and children were included when dehydration was the result of physical exercise and when drinking carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions, of any percentage carbohydrate, was compared with drinking water. All languages were included if an English abstract was available. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on study design, study population, interventions, outcome measures, and study limitations were extracted from each included article. Certainty was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 3485 articles screened, 19 articles in which authors assessed CE solutions (0%-9% carbohydrate) compared with water were included. Although variability was present among the identified studies, drinking 0% to 3.9% and especially 4% to 9% CE solution may be effective for rehydration.

conclusionsA potential beneficial effect of drinking CE drinks compared with water was observed for many of the reviewed outcomes. Commercial CE drinks (ideally 4%-9% CE drinks or alternatively 0%-3.9% CE drinks) could be suggested for rehydration in individuals with exercise-associated dehydration when whole foods are not available.

Indexed as

BeveragesDehydrationElectrolytesExerciseFluid TherapyRehydration SolutionsHumansElectrolytesRehydration Solutionsfirst aidfluid balancehypohydrationsports drinks

Identifiers

PMID38116803
PMCPMC11789749
OpenAlexW4390002479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.