Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38116792›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Simulation study of protoacoustics as a real-time in-line dosimetry tool for FLASH proton therapy.

Kaitlyn Kim, Prabodh Kumar Pandey, Gilberto Gonzalez, Yong Chen, Liangzhong Xiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 4DPhysics in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaitlyn KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Prabodh Kumar PandeyDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Gilberto GonzalezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Yong ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Liangzhong XiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Melanie Funes · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Academic-Industry Partnership for the Translation of a 4D in vivo Dosimetry Approach for Radiation TherapyR37CA240806 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI CHEN, YONG, IVANOV, VASSILI · 2019 to 2025
$2.9M
American Cancer Society 133697-RSG-19-110-01-CCEChao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center P30CA062203NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCI NIH HHS R37 CA240806NCI NIH HHS R37CA240806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApplying ultra-high dose rates to radiation therapy, otherwise known as FLASH, has been shown to be just as effective while sparing more normal tissue compared to conventional radiation therapy. However, there is a need for a dosimeter that is able to detect such high instantaneous dose, particularly in vivo. To fulfill this need, protoacoustics is introduced, which is an in vivo range verification method with submillimeter accuracy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of using protoacoustics as a method of in vivo real-time monitoring during FLASH proton therapy and investigating the resulting protoacoustic signal when dose per pulse and pulsewidth are varied through multiple simulation studies.

methodsThe dose distribution of a proton pencil beam was calculated through a Monte Carlo toolbox, TOPAS. Next, the k-Wave toolbox in MATLAB was used for performing protoacoustic simulations, where the initial proton dose deposition was inputted to model acoustic propagations, which were also used for reconstructions. Simulations involving the manipulation of the dose per pulse and pulsewidth were performed, and the temporal and spatial resolution for protoacoustic reconstructions were investigated as well. A 3D reconstruction was performed with a multiple beam spot profile to investigate the spatial resolution as well as determine the feasibility of 3D imaging with protoacoustics.

resultsOur results showed consistent linearity in the increasing dose-per-pulse, even up to rates considered for FLASH. The simulations and reconstructions were performed for a range of pulsewidths from 0.1 to 10 μs. The results show the characteristics of the proton beam after convolving the protoacoustic signal with the varying pulsewidths. 3D reconstruction was successfully performed with each beam being distinguishable using an 8 cm × 8 cm planar array. These simulation results show that measurements using protoacoustics has the potential for in vivo dosimetry in FLASH therapy during patient treatments in real time.

conclusionThrough this simulation study, the use of protoacoustics in FLASH therapy was verified and explored through observations of varying parameters, such as the dose per pulse and pulsewidth. 2D and 3D reconstructions were also completed. This study shows the significance of using protoacoustics and provides necessary information, which can further be explored in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Monte Carlo MethodProton TherapyRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageAcousticsComputer SimulationFeasibility StudiesHumansTime Factorsflash proton therapyin vivo dosimetryionoacousticsprotoacoustics

Identifiers

PMID38116792
PMCPMC11186976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.