ArticleEpilepsia2024
Statistical learning in epilepsy: Behavioral and anatomical mechanisms in the human brain.
Article in Epilepsia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveStatistical learning, the fundamental cognitive ability of humans to extract regularities across experiences over time, engages the medial temporal lobe (MTL) in the healthy brain. This leads to the hypothesis that statistical learning (SL) may be impaired in patients with epilepsy (PWE) involving the temporal lobe, and that this impairment could contribute to their varied memory deficits. In turn, studies done in collaboration with PWE, that evaluate the necessity of MTL circuitry through disease and causal perturbations, provide an opportunity to advance basic understanding of SL.
methodsWe implemented behavioral testing, volumetric analysis of the MTL substructures, and direct electrical brain stimulation to examine SL across a cohort of 61 PWE and 28 healthy controls.
resultsWe found that behavioral performance in an SL task was negatively associated with seizure frequency irrespective of seizure origin. The volume of hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA2/3 correlated with SL performance, suggesting a more specific role of the hippocampus. Transient direct electrical stimulation of the hippocampus disrupted SL. Furthermore, the relationship between SL and seizure frequency was selective, as behavioral performance in an episodic memory task was not impacted by seizure frequency. SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, these results suggest that SL may be hippocampally dependent and that the SL task could serve as a clinically useful behavioral assay of seizure frequency that may complement existing approaches such as seizure diaries. Simple and short SL tasks may thus provide patient-centered endpoints for evaluating the efficacy of novel treatments in epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.