Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38116661›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2024

Enhancing post-diagnostic care in Australian memory clinics: Health professionals' insights into current practices, barriers and facilitators, and desirable support.

Slađana Pavković, Lynette Ruth Goldberg, Maree Farrow, Jane Alty, Melissa Abela, Sharon Naismith, Perminder Sachdev, Lee-Fay Low

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Slađana PavkovićWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3082-8533
Lynette Ruth GoldbergWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8217-317X
Maree FarrowWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia.
Jane AltyWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5456-8676
Melissa AbelaWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, College of Health and Medicine, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-0787
Sharon NaismithThe University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Australia.
Perminder SachdevCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing Neuropsychiatric Institute Euroa Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9595-3220
Lee-Fay LowUniversity of Sydney Faculty of Health Sciences, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-3525
University of Tasmania · AUThe University of Sydney · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProviding integrated and evidence-based support to individuals and families following a diagnosis of dementia is essential in order to optimise their quality of life and assist them to live well. Memory clinics provide multidisciplinary services specialising in the assessment and post-diagnostic treatment of people with dementia. This study sought to identify current practices, barriers and facilitators to provision of postdiagnostic support and to obtain health professionals' opinion of ideal post-diagnostic support to be offered in Australian memory clinics. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional qualitative exploratory study. Data was collected from health professionals familiar with the process of diagnosis and post-diagnostic support through two expert panel meetings (

resultsSeven themes and three subthemes were identified under the three topics: Current Practices, Barriers and Facilitators, and Desirable Support. Themes relating to Current Practices were: Tailored Communication and feedback about diagnosis; Prescription of medications and follow-up; and Referrals to health and community services. Themes relating to Barriers and Facilitators were: The structure of the current system; Lack of funding; Lack of resources; Call for government investment. Themes relating to Desirable support were: A key/single point of support; Cognitive interventions; and Counselling and education.

conclusionPost-diagnostic support in Australian memory clinics focused primarily on ensuring people understood their diagnosis, information about postdiagnostic support was provided, and dementia medications were prescribed. There were notable differences in practices in metropolitan compared to regional areas. A key concern was the need for increased funding, particularly to support the establishment of a single point of contact to facilitate continuity of care.

Indexed as

DementiaQuality of LifeAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchAustraliadementiadiagnosishealth professionalsmemory clinicspost-diagnostic support

Identifiers

PMID38116661
PMCPMC10797845
OpenAlexW4388973120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.