Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38116528›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2023

Application of artificial intelligence approaches to predict the metabolism of xenobiotic molecules by human gut microbiome.

Aditya S Malwe, Vineet K Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aditya S MalweMetaBioSys Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, India.
Vineet K SharmaMetaBioSys Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, India.
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A highly complex, diverse, and dense community of more than 1,000 different gut bacterial species constitutes the human gut microbiome that harbours vast metabolic capabilities encoded by more than 300,000 bacterial enzymes to metabolise complex polysaccharides, orally administered drugs/xenobiotics, nutraceuticals, or prebiotics. One of the implications of gut microbiome mediated biotransformation is the metabolism of xenobiotics such as medicinal drugs, which lead to alteration in their pharmacological properties, loss of drug efficacy, bioavailability, may generate toxic byproducts and sometimes also help in conversion of a prodrug into its active metabolite. Given the diversity of gut microbiome and the complex interplay of the metabolic enzymes and their diverse substrates, the traditional experimental methods have limited ability to identify the gut bacterial species involved in such biotransformation, and to study the bacterial species-metabolite interactions in gut. In this scenario, computational approaches such as machine learning-based tools presents unprecedented opportunities and ability to predict the gut bacteria and enzymes that can potentially metabolise a candidate drug. Here, we have reviewed the need to identify the gut microbiome-based metabolism of xenobiotics and have provided comprehensive information on the available methods, tools, and databases to address it along with their scope and limitations.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedrug designinghuman gut microbiomemachine learningxenobiotic biotransformation

Identifiers

PMID38116528
PMCPMC10728657
OpenAlexW4389344828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.