Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38116517›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2023

Critical values notification: A nationwide survey of practices among clinical laboratories across Nigeria.

Lucius C Imoh, Idris Y Mohammed, Ifeyinwa D Nnakenyi, Ephraim U Egbuagha, Tomisin M Adaja, Chinelo P Onyenekwu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A survey of doctors' perspectives on critical laboratory result communication in Cape Town, South Africa.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucius C ImohDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7368-2650
Idris Y MohammedDepartment of Chemical Pathology & Immunology, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University and Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Kano State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4856-218X
Ifeyinwa D NnakenyiDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Nigeria Nsukka and University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-4241
Ephraim U EgbuaghaDepartment of Pathology, Clinix Healthcare Ltd, Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1211-0131
Tomisin M AdajaDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Federal Medical Centre, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-3651
Chinelo P OnyenekwuDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Ben Carson Snr School of Medicine, Babcock University and Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9906-9694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Critical value notification (CVN) entails notifying doctors or other laboratory users of aberrant laboratory results that threaten the patient's life and of any values for which reporting delays could negatively impact the patient's health. Critical value notification practices in clinical laboratories in Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa are largely unknown. Objective: We conducted a nationwide survey to obtain baseline information on CVN practice by Nigeria's laboratories. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among purposively selected secondary- and tertiary-tier, public and private clinical laboratories across northern and southern Nigeria between October 2015 and December 2015. Consenting senior laboratory staff completed and returned a structured questionnaire, that gathered data on respondents' demographics, designations, and institutional characteristics and practices regarding CVN. Results: One hundred and thirty-four laboratories responded to the questionnaires. Only 69 (51.5 %) laboratories practised CVN; only 23 (33.3%) had existing written policies guiding the practice. Most (43; 62.3%) laboratories use similar critical values (CVs) for adult and paediatric populations. Most laboratories (27; 39.1%) obtained their CVs by combining published literature and local opinions from stakeholders. Physical dispatch (42; 60.9%) followed by telephone calls (38; 55.1%) were the most common means of notification. Private laboratories, compared with public hospital laboratories, were likelier to have separate paediatric CV lists ( Conclusion: Critical value notification practices vary and are often suboptimal in many clinical laboratories in Nigeria, which is exacerbated by the absence of guiding policies and national recommendations for post-analytical procedures. What this study adds: This study provides baseline information on CVN practice by Nigeria's laboratories. The study explores the causes of practice variations that can serve as a foundation for enhancing critical reporting and post-analytical services, particularly in clinical laboratories in sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

critical value notificationcritical value reportingcritical valueslaboratory quality managementpost-analytical services

Identifiers

PMID38116517
PMCPMC10729493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.