Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38116502›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

Increased syphilis testing and detection of late latent syphilis among women after switching from risk-based to opt-out testing strategy in an urban Australian sexual health clinic: a retrospective observational study.

Palak Gupta, Christopher K Fairley, Marcus Y Chen, Catriona S Bradshaw, Glenda Fehler, Erica L Plummer, Lenka A Vodstrcil, Julien Tran, Ei T Aung, Eric P F Chow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Palak GuptaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher K FairleyMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marcus Y ChenMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Catriona S BradshawMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Glenda FehlerMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Erica L PlummerMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lenka A VodstrcilMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Julien TranMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ei T AungMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Eric P F ChowMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) implemented an opt-out syphilis test for women in December 2017. We aimed to examine the differences in syphilis testing uptake and confirmed syphilis cases among women after switching from risk-based to opt-out testing strategies. Methods: This was a retrospective study examining all women attending the MSHC for the first time in periods of risk-based testing (2015-2017) and opt-out testing (2018-2020). We calculated the proportion of women who tested for syphilis and the proportion of women with confirmed syphilis in each period. A chi-square test was performed to determine the differences in proportion between the risk-based testing and opt-out periods. Findings: A total of 27,481 women (i.e. 13,059 in the risk-based testing period and 14,422 in the opt-out period) were included in the final analysis, and the mean age was 26.8 years (standard deviation = 6.9). The proportion of women who were tested for syphilis at their first consultation increased from 52.8% (6890/13,059) in the risk-based testing period to 67.4% (9725/14,422) in the opt-out period (p < 0.0001). Syphilis positivity did not differ between the two periods (0.48% [33/6890] vs 0.71% [69/9725], p = 0.061) but late latent causes increased from 36.4% [12/33] to 60.9% [42/69] (p = 0.033). Interpretation: The opt-out testing strategy increased syphilis testing among women with increased detection of asymptomatic late latent syphilis. The opt-out syphilis testing strategy is beneficial in sexual health services. Health education and awareness may be required to improve syphilis testing uptake. Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

ScreeningSexually transmitted diseaseSexually transmitted infectionSyphilisWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID38116502
PMCPMC10730308
OpenAlexW4385622856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.